David Pichler vs Javier Barranco CosanoPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
🇦🇹David Pichler
#1075 · 30 yrs · R
41w41 meeting · sets 0–2
🇪🇸Javier Barranco Cosano
#433 · 27 yrs · L
David Pichler and Javier Barranco Cosano have met 1 time since 2025; Javier Barranco Cosano leads 1–0. Across all meetings Pichler has taken 0 sets to Cosano's 2. Their most recent meeting: Javier Barranco Cosano won at Braga (2025).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Pichler | Barranco Cosano | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | David Pichler | Javier Barranco Cosano | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 75% | 3/4 | 67% | 14/21 |
| Wins a set when losing | 0% | 0/5 | 33% | 7/21 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 11% | 1/9 | 33% | 14/42 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 45% | 10/22 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 44% | 4/9 | 56% | 9/16 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 50% | 1/2 | 20% | 2/10 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 100% | 3/3 | 77% | 17/22 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 100% | 3/3 | 64% | 14/22 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Pichler 0, Barranco Cosano 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Pichler
⚙️ Grinder
Cosano
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
⚙️ Grinder vs ⚔️ The Gladiator is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 646 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Sep 29, 2025
Braga
C Clay · 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Pichler | Cosano |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 10–5 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.51 |
| ROI % | - | -9.3% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.40u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Pichler | Cosano |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 1 |
| Matches | — | 2 |
| Distance | — | 0 mi · 0 km |
| Route | — | CZE |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Pichler has a higher win rate against shared opponents (50% vs Cosano's 0%).
| Opponent | Pichler | Cosano |
|---|---|---|
| Matej Dodig | W 76 64 | L 36 67 |
| Buvaysar Gadamauri | L 16 26 | L 75 46 67 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Bergamo · 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 16
Francesco Maestrelli
Bratislava 2 Challenger · 2nd Round
Oct 30
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Bratislava 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Oct 28
Michal Krajci
Bratislava 2 · 2nd Round Qualifying
Oct 27
Matej Dodig
Bratislava 2 · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 26
Javier Barranco Cosano
Braga · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 29
Michael Vrbensky
Szczecin · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 7
Jakub Paul
Cassis · 2nd Round Qualifying
Sep 2
Radu Mihai Papoe
Prague Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 19
Martin Krumich
Prague Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 18
Reda Bennani
M25 Denia · Quarterfinals
Jul 24
Michiel De Krom
M25 Denia · 2nd Round
Jul 23
Pavel Petrov (RUS)
M25 Denia · 1st Round
Jul 22
Pavel Petrov (RUS)
M25 Denia · 1st Round
Jul 22
Eric Vanshelboim
M25 Gandia · Final
Jul 19
Reda Bennani
M25 Gandia · Semifinals
Jul 19
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 9–43 matches
| Metric | Pichler | Cosano |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 44% | 51% |
| Sets won | 42% | 51% |
| Games won | 45% | 52% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Pichler | Cosano |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Pichler | Cosano |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.