Daniel Verbeek vs Yannik KelmPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Daniel Verbeek and Yannik Kelm have met 1 time since 2026; Yannik Kelm leads 1–0. Across all meetings Verbeek has taken 0 sets to Kelm's 2. Their most recent meeting: Yannik Kelm won at M25 The Hague (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Verbeek | Kelm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Daniel Verbeek | Yannik Kelm | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 60% | 3/5 | 89% | 47/53 |
| Wins a set when losing | 25% | 4/16 | 56% | 15/27 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 29% | 6/21 | 26% | 21/80 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 33% | 1/3 | 73% | 30/41 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 23% | 3/13 | 84% | 26/31 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 80% | 4/5 | 64% | 9/14 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 67% | 4/6 | 86% | 48/56 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 50% | 3/6 | 84% | 47/56 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Verbeek 0, Kelm 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Verbeek
🏃 Pusher
Kelm
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
The ⚔️ The Gladiator archetype wins about 68% vs 🏃 Pusher across 36 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Yannik Kelm.
The Gladiator players often use physical intensity and balanced game to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 9, 2026
M25 The Hague
C Clay · 2nd Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Verbeek | Kelm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Daniel Verbeek | Yannik Kelm | ||
| 1 or more | 86% | 6/7 | 80% | 24/30 |
| 3 or more | 14% | 1/7 | 30% | 9/30 |
| 5 or more | 0% | 0/7 | 3% | 1/30 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/7 | 0% | 0/30 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/7 | 0% | 0/30 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/7 | 0% | 0/30 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Verbeek | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 4–5 | 30–4 |
| Avg odds | 2.86 | 1.48 |
| ROI % | -22.7% | +31.5% |
| Units P/L | -2.04u | +10.72u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Verbeek | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 2 | — |
| Events | 3 | — |
| Matches | 6 | — |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | BEL → NED | — |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Kelm has a higher win rate against shared opponents (57% vs Verbeek's 29%).
| Opponent | Verbeek | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Eric Vanshelboim | L 57 06 | L 26 16 |
| Lorenzo Angelini | W 06 60 62 | W 64 62 |
| Markel Garay Eceolaza | W 61 62 | W 61 64 |
| Louis Tessa | L 57 16 | L 46 57 |
| Oscar Jose Gutierrez | L 16 62 36 | W 63 62 |
| Alec Deckers | L 64 67 46 | L 46 61 26 |
| Yanki Erel | L 16 26 | W 76 62 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Eric Vanshelboim
M25 Oldenzaal · Semifinals
Aug 29
Lorenzo Angelini
M25 Oldenzaal · Quarterfinals
Aug 28
Eero Vasa
M25 Oldenzaal · 2nd Round
Aug 27
Richard Antoni
M25 Oldenzaal · 1st Round
Aug 26
Marc Majdandzic
M15 Lambermont · 1st Round
Aug 19
Abel Forger
M15 Eupen · 1st Round
Aug 5
Yannik Kelm
M25 The Hague · 2nd Round
Jul 9
Jim Hendrikx
M25 The Hague · 1st Round
Jul 8
Tom Sickenberger
M25 Wetzlar · Quarterfinals
Jul 31
Aaron Funk
M25 Wetzlar · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Deney Wassermann
M25 Wetzlar · 1st Round
Jul 29
Patrick Zahraj
M25 Metzingen · Semifinals
Jul 25
Johan Nikles
M25 Metzingen · Quarterfinals
Jul 24
David Eichenseher
M25 Metzingen · 2nd Round
Jul 23
John Hallquist Lithen
M25 Metzingen · 1st Round
Jul 21
Louis Wessels
M25 The Hague · Semifinals
Jul 11
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 21–80 matches
| Metric | Verbeek | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 24% | 66% |
| Sets won | 29% | 67% |
| Games won | 42% | 56% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Verbeek | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Verbeek | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.