Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Daniel Milavsky vs Luca WiedenmannPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Upcoming match

Tournament
Knoxville Challenger
Level
ATP Challenger Tour
Round
1st Round Qualifying
Surface
Hard
Date & time
November 8 Β· 8:15 PM ET

Book odds

Daniel Milavsky1.321.24
Luca Wiedenmann3.173.72
MilavskyHard-court specialist (91%)WiedenmannHard-court specialist (69%)

Record at prices like this

Daniel Milavsky1.24implies 82%won 88%+6 pts

At 1.24 or shorter, Daniel Milavsky has won 23 of 26 (88%). The price implied 82%, so Daniel Milavsky has beaten it by 6 points.

Book prices with the bookmaker margin removed, across every priced match we hold for each player. Green beats the price by 3 points or more, red falls that far short, grey is within 3 points. Samples under ten are not shown.

Daniel Milavsky and Luca Wiedenmann meet in the first round of qualifying at the Knoxville Challenger on November 8 on hard courts. Milavsky, ranked 307th, arrives fresh off six matches in two weeks, most recently a loss three days ago. Wiedenmann sits at 495th and has not played in three weeks, though he was undefeated across his last five outings.

The two have never faced each other. Milavsky has won 60% of his last five matches and 60% of his last ten. Wiedenmann's recent record runs stronger: 5-0 in his last five and 8-2 over his last ten, with a hard court sample showing 15-5 at 75% compared to Milavsky's 11-9 at 55%.

Milavsky operates as a well-rounded player who can mix pace and variety from the baseline. Wiedenmann constructs points as a counterpuncher, reading opponents and striking when the moment opens. The match will test whether Milavsky's current rhythm, built on heavy match play, can impose itself against Wiedenmann's defensive precision and court sense after three weeks away.

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorMilavskyWiedenmann
Wins in straight sets80%74%
Wins a set when losing50%32%
Goes to a deciding set32%28%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite60%63%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog62%37%
Tiebreak sets won54%59%
Wins after taking set 181%90%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 171%77%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record.

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Milavsky

πŸ‘‘ The Complete Package

Elite serve & returnHigh BP conversionAll-surface dominanceClutch performer
vs

Wiedenmann

πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance

Matchup analysis

The πŸ‘‘ The Complete Package archetype wins about 53% vs πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher across 1,952 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Daniel Milavsky.

The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.

Previous meetings

First career meeting

Milavsky and Wiedenmann have never faced each other on tour.

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days

OutcomeMilavskyWiedenmann
1 or more100%84%
3 or more94%37%
5 or more81%0%
10 or more19%0%
15 or more0%0%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricMilavskyWiedenmann
W-L8–813–8
Avg odds2.081.89
ROI %-10.6%-8.1%
Units P/L-1.69u-1.70u

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Milavsky has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Wiedenmann's 50%).

OpponentMilavskyWiedenmann
Felix Balshaw
W
57
75
76
L
26
46
Samuel Battistone
W
60
62
W
61
61

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Milavsky
LWWWLWLW
L

Max Hans Rehberg

Charlottesville Challenger Β· 2nd Round

762
57
57

Nov 5

W

Alexis Galarneau

Charlottesville Challenger Β· 1st Round

763
63

Nov 3

W

Shunsuke Mitsui

Charlottesville Challenger Β· 3rd Round Qualifying

766
764

Nov 2

W

Joshua Charlton

Charlottesville Challenger Β· 1st Round Qualifying

63
766

Nov 1

L

J.J. Wolf

Sioux Falls Challenger Β· 2nd Round

677
637

Oct 28

W

Harry Wendelken

Sioux Falls Challenger Β· 1st Round

64
46
63

Oct 26

L

Darwin Blanch

Fort Worth Challenger Β· 2nd Round

16
46

Oct 21

W

Govind Nanda

Fort Worth Challenger Β· 1st Round

64
64

Oct 19

Wiedenmann
WWWWWLWW
W

Robin Bertrand

M15 Monastir Β· Final

766
60

Oct 18

W

Leo Borg

M15 Monastir Β· Semifinals

62
75

Oct 17

W

Samir Hamza Reguig

M15 Monastir Β· Quarterfinals

60
60

Oct 16

W

Kris Van Wyk

M15 Monastir Β· 2nd Round

62
62

Oct 15

W

Fnu Nidunjianzan

M15 Monastir Β· 1st Round

61
62

Oct 14

L

John Echeverria

M15 Monastir Β· Quarterfinals

46
57

Oct 9

W

Isaac Nortey

M15 Monastir Β· 2nd Round

64
64

Oct 8

W

Andrea Colombo

M15 Monastir Β· 1st Round

62
57
60

Oct 6

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 76–87 matches

MetricMilavskyWiedenmann
Matches won61%71%
Sets won61%67%
Games won54%57%