Daniel Milavsky vs Govind NandaPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Upcoming match
- Tournament
- Fort Worth Challenger
- Level
- ATP Challenger Tour
- Round
- 1st Round
- Surface
- Hard
- Date & time
- October 19 Β· 3:45 PM ET
Book odds
Set spread
Game spread
Record at prices like this
At 1.19 or shorter, Daniel Milavsky has won 28 of 29 (97%). The price implied 86%, so Daniel Milavsky has beaten it by 11 points.
At 4.26 or longer, Govind Nanda has won 4 of 10 (40%). The price implied 21%, so Govind Nanda has beaten it by 19 points.
Book prices with the bookmaker margin removed, across every priced match we hold for each player. Green beats the price by 3 points or more, red falls that far short, grey is within 3 points. Samples under ten are not shown.
Daniel Milavsky and Govind Nanda meet next at the Fort Worth Challenger on October 19 on hard.
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Milavsky | Nanda | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Daniel Milavsky | Govind Nanda | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 78% | 38/49 | β | |
| Wins a set when losing | 52% | 15/29 | β | |
| Goes to a deciding set | 33% | 26/78 | β | |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | 59% | 30/51 | β | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 65% | 15/23 | β | |
| Tiebreak sets won | 52% | 12/23 | β | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 83% | 45/54 | β | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 70% | 38/54 | β | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β read with care.
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Milavsky
π The Complete Package
Nanda
βοΈ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The π The Complete Package archetype wins about 54% vs βοΈ Grinder across 254 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Daniel Milavsky.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.
Previous meetings
First career meeting
Milavsky and Nanda have never faced each other on tour.
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Milavsky | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8β7 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.10 | - |
| ROI % | +9.8% | - |
| Units P/L | +1.47u | - |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Milavsky | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | β |
| Events | 2 | β |
| Matches | 3 | β |
| Distance | 1,953 mi Β· 3,143 km | β |
| Route | USA | β |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Darwin Blanch
Columbus Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Sep 30
Blaise Bicknell
Columbus Challenger Β· 1st Round
Sep 28
Timo Legout
San Diego 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round
Sep 22
Federico Agustin Gomez
Tiburon Challenger Β· 1st Round
Sep 15
Shintaro Mochizuki
U.S. Open - New York Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 25
Lloyd Harris
Brownsburg Challenger Β· Semifinals
Aug 15
Rei Sakamoto
Brownsburg Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Aug 14
Edas Butvilas
Brownsburg Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Aug 13
Tristan Schoolkate
ATP Masters 1000 Canada Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 26
Moerani Bouzige
Washington Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 20
Denis Shapovalov
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos Β· 2nd Round
Jul 16
Colton Smith
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos Β· 1st Round
Jul 15
Taha Baadi
Los Cabos Β· 2nd Round Qualifying
Jul 13
Strong Kirchheimer
Los Cabos Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 12
Alex Rybakov
Tyler Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jun 3
Alexis Galarneau
Little Rock Challenger Β· 1st Round
May 28
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 78β78 matches
| Metric | Milavsky | Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 63% | - |
| Sets won | 62% | - |
| Games won | 55% | - |