Daniel Michalski vs Inigo CervantesPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Daniel Michalski and Inigo Cervantes have met 1 time since 2022; Daniel Michalski leads 1–0. Across all meetings Michalski has taken 2 sets to Cervantes's 1. Their most recent meeting: Daniel Michalski won at Lisbon (2022).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Michalski | Cervantes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Daniel Michalski | Inigo Cervantes | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 76% | 31/41 | — | |
| Wins a set when losing | 36% | 9/25 | — | |
| Goes to a deciding set | 29% | 19/66 | — | |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 66% | 27/41 | — | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 50% | 11/22 | — | |
| Tiebreak sets won | 50% | 7/14 | — | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 90% | 37/41 | — | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 76% | 31/41 | — | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Michalski 0, Cervantes 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Michalski
⚔️ The Gladiator
Cervantes
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 55% vs ⚔️ The Gladiator across 1,349 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Inigo Cervantes.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Sep 25, 2022
Lisbon
C Clay · 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Michalski | Cervantes |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 22–5 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.33 | - |
| ROI % | -5.7% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.53u | - |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Michalski | Cervantes |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | — |
| Events | 1 | — |
| Matches | 1 | — |
| Distance | 0 mi · 0 km | — |
| Route | POL | — |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Alexander Weis
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula · Final
Oct 11
Ivan Ivanov
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula · Semifinals
Oct 10
Giovanni Oradini
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula · Quarterfinals
Oct 9
Alessandro Bellifemine
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula · 2nd Round
Oct 8
Lorenzo Bocchi
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula · 1st Round
Oct 7
Laurent Lokoli
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula · Final
Sep 26
Eric Vanshelboim
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula · Semifinals
Sep 25
Lorenzo Carboni
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula · Quarterfinals
Sep 25
Pol Martin Tiffon
Seville · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 1
Gerard Campana Lee
Porto 2 · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 25
Giorgio Ricca
Todi · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 11
Roberto Carballes Baena
Seville Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 5
Gastao Elias
Seville · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 4
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Seville · 2nd Round Qualifying
Sep 4
Filip Cristian Jianu
Alicante · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 2
Daniel Michalski
Lisbon · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 25
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 66–66 matches
| Metric | Michalski | Cervantes |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 62% | - |
| Sets won | 60% | - |
| Games won | 55% | - |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Michalski | Cervantes |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Michalski | Cervantes |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.