Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Colin Markes vs Thomas FancuttPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Colin Markes and Thomas Fancutt have met 1 time since 2024; Thomas Fancutt leads 1–0. Across all meetings Markes has taken 0 sets to Fancutt's 2. Their most recent meeting: Thomas Fancutt won at Indian Wells 2 (2024).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorMarkesFancutt
Wins in straight setsβ€”50%
Wins a set when losingβ€”45%
Goes to a deciding setβ€”48%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favoriteβ€”25%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdogβ€”78%
Tiebreak sets wonβ€”47%
Wins after taking set 1β€”77%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1β€”54%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β€” read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Markes 0, Fancutt 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Markes

βš™οΈ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude
vs

Fancutt

πŸ€– Servebot

High ace rateDominant serviceWeaker returnBig first serve

Matchup analysis

The πŸ€– Servebot archetype wins about 56% vs βš™οΈ Grinder across 1,470 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Thomas Fancutt.

Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Jan 21, 2024

Indian Wells 2

H Hard Β· 1st Round Qualifying

46
16
Fancutt

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricMarkesFancutt
W-L-3–4
Avg odds-2.50
ROI %--37.6%
Units P/L--2.63u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricMarkesFancutt
Countriesβ€”2
Eventsβ€”2
Matchesβ€”3
Distanceβ€”β€”
Routeβ€”USA β†’ JAM

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Markes
LLWWLWLL
L

Thomas Fancutt

Indian Wells 2 Β· 1st Round Qualifying

46
16

Jan 21

L

Michael Vrbensky

Drummondville Β· Round of 32

46
63
36

Nov 14

W

Nicaise Muamba

Drummondville Β· 2nd Round Qualifying

62
64

Nov 13

W

Kuang Qing Xu

Drummondville Β· 1st Round Qualifying

64
63

Nov 12

L

Alfredo Perez

Fairfield Β· 2nd Round Qualifying

36
62
46

Oct 9

W

Clement Chidekh

Fairfield Β· 1st Round Qualifying

64
62

Oct 8

L

Aidan Mayo

Columbus 2 Β· 1st Round Qualifying

26
26

Sep 17

L

Alex Rybakov

Cary 2 Β· 1st Round Qualifying

36
16

Sep 10

Fancutt
LWLWLWWL
L

Luis Felipe Miguel

Kingston 2 Challenger Β· 2nd Round

26
36

Aug 26

W

Karl Poling

Kingston 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round

64
63

Aug 25

L

Karl Poling

M25 East Lansing Β· 2nd Round

63
677
16

Aug 13

W

Lincoln Battle

M25 East Lansing Β· 1st Round

62
62

Aug 11

L

Jie Cui

Lincoln Challenger Β· 1st Round

36
46

Jul 14

W

Hiroki Moriya

Lincoln challenger

766
46
61

Jul 13

W

Kaylan Bigun

Lincoln challenger

64
657
62

Jul 12

L

Mathys Erhard

Plovdiv Challenger Β· 1st Round

63
36
06

Jun 23

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 25–25 matches

MetricMarkesFancutt
Matches won-56%
Sets won-53%
Games won-51%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageMarkesFancutt
ATP Challenger Tour01

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceMarkesFancutt
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Colin Markes vs Thomas Fancutt FAQ

Thomas Fancutt leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.