Colin Markes vs Thomas FancuttPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Colin Markes and Thomas Fancutt have met 1 time since 2024; Thomas Fancutt leads 1–0. Across all meetings Markes has taken 0 sets to Fancutt's 2. Their most recent meeting: Thomas Fancutt won at Indian Wells 2 (2024).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Markes | Fancutt | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Colin Markes | Thomas Fancutt | ||
| Wins in straight sets | — | 54% | 13/24 | |
| Wins a set when losing | — | 35% | 6/17 | |
| Goes to a deciding set | — | 41% | 17/41 | |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 60% | 6/10 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | — | 73% | 19/26 | |
| Tiebreak sets won | — | 58% | 11/19 | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | — | 86% | 19/22 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | — | 59% | 13/22 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Markes 0, Fancutt 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Markes
⚙️ Grinder
Fancutt
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 56% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 720 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Thomas Fancutt.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jan 21, 2024
Indian Wells 2
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Markes | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 5–6 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.60 |
| ROI % | - | -25.9% |
| Units P/L | - | -2.85u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Markes | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 2 |
| Distance | — | 542 mi · 872 km |
| Route | — | CHN |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Thomas Fancutt
Indian Wells 2 · 1st Round Qualifying
Jan 21
Michael Vrbensky
Drummondville Challenger · 1st Round
Nov 14
Nicaise Muamba
Drummondville · 2nd Round Qualifying
Nov 13
Kuang Qing Xu
Drummondville · 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 12
Alfredo Perez
Fairfield · 2nd Round Qualifying
Oct 9
Clement Chidekh
Fairfield · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 8
Aidan Mayo
Columbus 2 · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 17
Alex Rybakov
Cary 2 · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 10
Luka Pavlovic
Jinan Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 11
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Jingshan Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 28
Marat Sharipov
Guangzhou Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 15
James Kent Trotter
Guangzhou Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 14
Zijiang Yang
Guangzhou Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 13
Maxime Janvier
Cassis Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 6
Luis Felipe Miguel
Kingston 2 Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 26
Karl Poling
Kingston 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 25
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 41–41 matches
| Metric | Markes | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | - | 59% |
| Sets won | - | 55% |
| Games won | - | 51% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Markes | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Markes | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.