Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Cleeve Harper vs Michael MmohPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Cleeve Harper and Michael Mmoh have met 1 time since 2025; Michael Mmoh leads 1–0. Across all meetings Harper has taken 0 sets to Mmoh's 2. Their most recent meeting: Michael Mmoh won at Drummondville Challenger (2025).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorHarperMmoh
Wins in straight sets100%63%
Wins a set when losing20%18%
Goes to a deciding set14%30%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite0%48%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog40%44%
Tiebreak sets won100%71%
Wins after taking set 1100%92%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1100%79%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β€” read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Harper 0, Mmoh 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Harper

πŸ›‘οΈ The Spoiler

Strong court coverageStrong retrievalDefensive consistencyBeats elite opponents
vs

Mmoh

πŸ‘‘ The Complete Package

Elite serve & returnHigh BP conversionAll-surface dominanceClutch performer

Matchup analysis

The πŸ‘‘ The Complete Package archetype wins about 55% vs πŸ›‘οΈ The Spoiler across 65 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Michael Mmoh.

The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Nov 12, 2025

Drummondville Challenger

H Hard Β· 1st Round

36
36
Mmoh

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricHarperMmoh
W-L-3–5
Avg odds-1.69
ROI %--44.9%
Units P/L--3.59u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricHarperMmoh
Countriesβ€”1
Eventsβ€”2
Matchesβ€”3
Distanceβ€”161 mi Β· 259 km
Routeβ€”USA

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Harper
LWLLLLWL
L

Kilian Feldbausch

Elizabeth Moore Sarasota Open Β· 2nd Round Qualifying

16
36

Apr 6

W

Luis David Martinez

Elizabeth Moore Sarasota Open Β· 1st Round Qualifying

63
64

Apr 6

L

Maxence Beauge

Challenger Cherbourg La Manche Β· 1st Round Qualifying

46
26

Mar 8

L

Michael Mmoh

Drummondville Challenger Β· 1st Round

36
36

Nov 12

L

Adhithya Ganesan

Sioux Falls Β· 1st Round Qualifying

36
7866
46

Oct 19

L

Arthur Reymond

Olbia Β· 1st Round Qualifying

26
16

Oct 12

W

Orel Kimhi

Davis Cup, Group I, 1R, CAN-ISR 4-0 Β· Rubber 4

63
763

Sep 13

L

Stan Wawrinka

Cancun Challenger Β· 1st Round

36
46

Aug 14

Mmoh
LLWLWWLL
L

Edas Butvilas

Brownsburg Challenger Β· 1st Round

36
57

Aug 11

L

Rei Sakamoto

Lexington Challenger Β· 2nd Round

46
46

Aug 6

W

Harry Wendelken

Lexington Challenger Β· 1st Round

64
62

Aug 4

L

Benjamin Bonzi

Vancouver Challenger Β· 2nd Round

57
46

Jul 30

W

Yu Hsiou Hsu

Vancouver Challenger Β· 1st Round

63
64

Jul 29

W

Yuta Shimizu

Cary Challenger Β· 1st Round

763
765

Jun 30

L

Vilius Gaubas

Wimbledon Β· 1st Round Qualifying

64
36
26

Jun 22

L

Filippo Romano

Lexus Ilkley Open Β· 1st Round Qualifying

26
46

Jun 8

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 7–47 matches

MetricHarperMmoh
Matches won29%64%
Sets won33%58%
Games won41%53%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageHarperMmoh
ATP Challenger Tour01

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceHarperMmoh
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Cleeve Harper vs Michael Mmoh FAQ

Michael Mmoh leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.