Cing-Yang Meng vs James TrotterPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Cing-Yang Meng and James Trotter have met 1 time since 2024; James Trotter leads 1–0. Across all meetings Meng has taken 0 sets to Trotter's 2. Their most recent meeting: James Trotter won at Taipei (2024).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Meng | Trotter | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Cing-Yang Meng | James Trotter | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 0% | 0/1 | 62% | 13/21 |
| Wins a set when losing | 100% | 2/2 | 53% | 10/19 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 100% | 3/3 | 45% | 18/40 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 22% | 5/23 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 100% | 3/3 | 86% | 6/7 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 100% | 2/2 | 43% | 10/23 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 0% | 0/2 | 80% | 16/20 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 0% | 0/2 | 65% | 13/20 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Meng 0, Trotter 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Meng
🎯 Baseliner
Trotter
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
🎯 Baseliner vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 1,590 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
May 12, 2024
Taipei
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Meng | Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 4–1 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.96 |
| ROI % | - | +61.7% |
| Units P/L | - | +3.08u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Meng | Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 2 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 5 |
| Distance | — | 7,954 mi · 12,800 km |
| Route | — | CHN → USA |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
James McCabe
Taipei Challenger · 1st Round
Nov 3
Ye Cong Mo
M25 Qian Daohu 1 · 2nd Round
Oct 30
Mikal Statham
M25 Qian Daohu 1 · 1st Round
Oct 29
Chase Ferguson
M15 Maanshan 9 · 2nd Round
Sep 11
Zhan Zheng
M15 Maanshan 9 · 1st Round
Sep 10
Yusuke Takahashi
Taipei 2 · 2nd Round Qualifying
Oct 21
Kai-I Wang
Taipei 2 · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 20
James Trotter
Taipei · 1st Round Qualifying
May 12
Stefan Kozlov
Columbus Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 29
Li Tu
Columbus Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 28
Alexander Ikenna Okonkwo
Columbus Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 27
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Guangzhou Challenger · 2nd Round
Sep 17
Federico Cina
Guangzhou Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 16
Thomas Fancutt
Guangzhou Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 14
Ziyu Liu
Guangzhou Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 13
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Zhangjiagang Challenger · Quarterfinals
Sep 4
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 3–40 matches
| Metric | Meng | Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 33% | 53% |
| Sets won | 44% | 53% |
| Games won | 44% | 51% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Meng | Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Meng | Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.