Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Christasha Mcneil vs Lexington ReedPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Christasha Mcneil and Lexington Reed have met 1 time since 2026; Christasha Mcneil leads 1–0. Across all meetings Mcneil has taken 2 sets to Reed's 1. Their most recent meeting: Christasha Mcneil won at Columbus ITF (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorMcneilReed
Wins in straight sets67%67%
Wins a set when losing30%38%
Goes to a deciding set31%36%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite100%33%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog50%64%
Tiebreak sets won0%33%
Wins after taking set 163%63%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 150%50%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Mcneil 0, Reed 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Mcneil

πŸ’₯ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies
vs

Reed

βš™οΈ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude

Matchup analysis

The πŸ’₯ Big Hitter archetype wins about 61% vs βš™οΈ Grinder across 1,327 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Christasha Mcneil.

Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Jul 7, 2026

Columbus ITF

H Hard

16
64
64
Mcneil

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days

OutcomeMcneilReed
1 or more86%86%
3 or more29%43%
5 or more0%0%
10 or more0%0%
15 or more0%0%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricMcneilReed
W-L4–46–4
Avg odds2.463.00
ROI %-7.6%+71.3%
Units P/L-0.61u+7.13u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Across 2 shared opponents, both Mcneil and Reed posted a 0% win rate.

OpponentMcneilReed
Malaika Rapolu
L
63
16
36
L
64
36
26
Hanna Chang
L
06
26
L
26
46

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Mcneil
LLWWLWWL
L

Piper Charney

W35 Florence Β· 1st Round

26
36

Jul 29

L

Hanna Chang

W35 Dallas Β· Quarterfinals

06
26

Jul 17

W

Maria Kononova

W35 Dallas Β· 2nd Round

62
62

Jul 16

W

Boyoung Jeong

W35 Dallas Β· 1st Round

61
61

Jul 14

L

Haruka Kaji

W50 Columbus Β· 2nd Round

75
677
06

Jul 9

W

Rachel Gailis

W50 Columbus Β· 1st Round

64
62

Jul 8

W

Lexington Reed

Columbus ITF

16
64
64

Jul 7

L

Bella Payne

W35 Rome Β· 1st Round

63
36
637

Jun 23

Reed
LWLLWWWW
L

Fiona Crawley

W75 Lexington Β· 2nd Round

766
26
607

Jul 30

W

Kayo Nishimura

W75 Lexington Β· 1st Round

62
64

Jul 29

L

Malaika Rapolu

W35 Santa Fe Β· 1st Round

64
36
26

Jul 22

L

Hanna Chang

W35 Dallas Β· Semifinals

26
46

Jul 18

W

Malaika Rapolu

W35 Dallas Β· Quarterfinals

63
57
62

Jul 17

W

J A Jackson

Dallas 2 ITF Β· Round of 16

63
62

Jul 16

W

Jennifer Jackson

W35 Dallas Β· 2nd Round

63
62

Jul 16

W

Eunhye Lee

W35 Dallas Β· 1st Round

75
61

Jul 15

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 14–16 matches

MetricMcneilReed
Matches won38%43%
Sets won41%45%
Games won45%49%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageMcneilReed
ITF W10

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceMcneilReed
Hard10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Christasha Mcneil vs Lexington Reed FAQ

Christasha Mcneil leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.