Christasha Mcneil vs Lexington ReedPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
πΊπΈChristasha Mcneil
#842 Β· 19 yrs Β· Right-Handed
5w1 meeting Β· sets 2β1
πΊπΈLexington Reed
Unranked Β· 20 yrs
5w5Christasha Mcneil and Lexington Reed have met 1 time since 2026; Christasha Mcneil leads 1β0. Across all meetings Mcneil has taken 2 sets to Reed's 1. Their most recent meeting: Christasha Mcneil won at Columbus ITF (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Mcneil | Reed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Christasha Mcneil | Lexington Reed | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 67% | 4/6 | 67% | 4/6 |
| Wins a set when losing | 30% | 3/10 | 38% | 3/8 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 31% | 5/16 | 36% | 5/14 |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | 100% | 1/1 | 33% | 1/3 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 50% | 7/14 | 64% | 7/11 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 0% | 0/2 | 33% | 1/3 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 63% | 5/8 | 63% | 5/8 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 50% | 4/8 | 50% | 4/8 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Mcneil 0, Reed 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mcneil
π₯ Big Hitter
Reed
βοΈ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The π₯ Big Hitter archetype wins about 61% vs βοΈ Grinder across 1,327 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Christasha Mcneil.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 7, 2026
Columbus ITF
H Hard
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days
| Outcome | Mcneil | Reed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Christasha Mcneil | Lexington Reed | ||
| 1 or more | 86% | 6/7 | 86% | 6/7 |
| 3 or more | 29% | 2/7 | 43% | 3/7 |
| 5 or more | 0% | 0/7 | 0% | 0/7 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/7 | 0% | 0/7 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/7 | 0% | 0/7 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/7 | 0% | 0/7 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Mcneil | Reed |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 4β4 | 6β4 |
| Avg odds | 2.46 | 3.00 |
| ROI % | -7.6% | +71.3% |
| Units P/L | -0.61u | +7.13u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months
Across 2 shared opponents, both Mcneil and Reed posted a 0% win rate.
| Opponent | Mcneil | Reed |
|---|---|---|
| Malaika Rapolu | L 63 16 36 | L 64 36 26 |
| Hanna Chang | L 06 26 | L 26 46 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Piper Charney
W35 Florence Β· 1st Round
Jul 29
Hanna Chang
W35 Dallas Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 17
Maria Kononova
W35 Dallas Β· 2nd Round
Jul 16
Boyoung Jeong
W35 Dallas Β· 1st Round
Jul 14
Haruka Kaji
W50 Columbus Β· 2nd Round
Jul 9
Rachel Gailis
W50 Columbus Β· 1st Round
Jul 8
Lexington Reed
Columbus ITF
Jul 7
Bella Payne
W35 Rome Β· 1st Round
Jun 23
Fiona Crawley
W75 Lexington Β· 2nd Round
Jul 30
Kayo Nishimura
W75 Lexington Β· 1st Round
Jul 29
Malaika Rapolu
W35 Santa Fe Β· 1st Round
Jul 22
Hanna Chang
W35 Dallas Β· Semifinals
Jul 18
Malaika Rapolu
W35 Dallas Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 17
J A Jackson
Dallas 2 ITF Β· Round of 16
Jul 16
Jennifer Jackson
W35 Dallas Β· 2nd Round
Jul 16
Eunhye Lee
W35 Dallas Β· 1st Round
Jul 15
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 14β16 matches
| Metric | Mcneil | Reed |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 38% | 43% |
| Sets won | 41% | 45% |
| Games won | 45% | 49% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Mcneil | Reed |
|---|---|---|
| ITF W | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Mcneil | Reed |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.