Chih-Jen Ho vs Go SoedaPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Chih-Jen Ho and Go Soeda have met 1 time since 2015; Go Soeda leads 1–0. Across all meetings Ho has taken 0 sets to Soeda's 2. Their most recent meeting: Go Soeda won at Taipei (2015).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Ho | Soeda | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Chih-Jen Ho | Go Soeda | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 100% | 1/1 | — | |
| Wins a set when losing | 0% | 0/1 | — | |
| Goes to a deciding set | 0% | 0/2 | — | |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | — | ||
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 50% | 1/2 | — | |
| Tiebreak sets won | — | — | ||
| Wins after taking set 1 | 100% | 1/1 | — | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 100% | 1/1 | — | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Ho 0, Soeda 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ho
🎯 Baseliner
Soeda
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 53% vs 🎾 All-Court across 222 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Chih-Jen Ho.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the all-court's tactical versatility.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Apr 29, 2015
Taipei
H Hard · Round of 32
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ho | Soeda |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–1 | - |
| Avg odds | 6.29 | - |
| ROI % | +214.5% | - |
| Units P/L | +4.29u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Ho | Soeda |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | — |
| Events | 1 | — |
| Matches | 2 | — |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | TPE | — |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Tai Sach
M25 Taipei · 2nd Round
Aug 20
Koki Matsuda
M25 Taipei · 1st Round
Aug 18
Daniil Medvedev
Kaohsiung · 2nd Round Qualifying
Sep 3
Li-Wei Tan
Kaohsiung · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 2
Go Soeda
Taipei · Round of 32
Apr 29
Blaz Kavcic
Hong Kong · Round of 32
Jan 29
Sho Shimabukuro
Tokyo · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 1
Maximilian Neuchrist
Zagreb · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 9
Clement Tabur
Prague 2 · 1st Round Qualifying
May 1
Mats Rosenkranz
St. Brieuc · Round of 32
Mar 30
Kacper Zuk
Biel · Round of 32
Mar 21
Mikhail Kukushkin
Phoenix · 1st Round Qualifying
Mar 14
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
Monterrey · Semifinals
Mar 11
Ulises Blanch
Monterrey · Quarterfinals
Mar 10
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 2–2 matches
| Metric | Ho | Soeda |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 50% | - |
| Sets won | 50% | - |
| Games won | 51% | - |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Ho | Soeda |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Ho | Soeda |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.