Chiara Di Tommaso vs Elena MicicPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Chiara Di Tommaso and Elena Micic have met 1 time since 2026; Elena Micic leads 1–0. Across all meetings Tommaso has taken 1 sets to Micic's 2. Their most recent meeting: Elena Micic won at W35 Timaru 1 (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Di Tommaso | Micic | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Chiara Di Tommaso | Elena Micic | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 0% | 0/2 | 63% | 22/35 |
| Wins a set when losing | 22% | 2/9 | 22% | 6/27 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 36% | 4/11 | 31% | 19/62 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 48% | 14/29 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 40% | 2/5 | 57% | 17/30 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 100% | 1/1 | 63% | 10/16 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 50% | 2/4 | 88% | 30/34 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 0% | 0/4 | 65% | 22/34 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Di Tommaso 0, Micic 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Tommaso
🏃 Pusher
Micic
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 72% vs 🏃 Pusher across 828 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Elena Micic.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Mar 11, 2026
W35 Timaru 1
H Hard · 1st Round
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Tommaso | Micic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 8–7 |
| Avg odds | - | 3.60 |
| ROI % | - | +29.0% |
| Units P/L | - | +4.35u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Tommaso | Micic |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 1 |
| Matches | — | 1 |
| Distance | — | 0 mi · 0 km |
| Route | — | KAZ |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Micic has a higher win rate against shared opponents (50% vs Tommaso's 0%).
| Opponent | Tommaso | Micic |
|---|---|---|
| Naho Sato | L 26 26 | L 46 16 |
| Sarah Rokusek | L 16 16 | W 60 76 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
J C Adams
Brisbane 6 ITF
Jul 13
Nana Onozawa
Sapporo 2 ITF
Jun 22
Kurea Hayasaka
Tokyo ITF
Jun 7
Kamonwan Yodpetch
W15 Nakhon Pathom · 1st Round
May 12
Naho Sato
W15 Nakhon Pathom · 1st Round
May 6
Elena Micic
W35 Timaru 1 · 1st Round
Mar 11
Sarah Rokusek
W15 Hamilton 1 · Quarterfinals
Dec 12
Monique Barry
W15 Hamilton 1 · 2nd Round
Dec 11
Veronika Podrez
Polish Open - Warsaw · 1st Round
Aug 3
Qinwen Zheng
Athens Open - Athens · 2nd Round
Jul 15
Martha Matoula
Athens Open - Athens · 1st Round
Jul 13
Anastasia Kulikova
Athens WTA
Jul 12
Makoto Ninomiya
Athens WTA
Jul 11
Han Shi
W50 Elvas · 2nd Round
Jul 3
Francisca Jorge
W50 Elvas · 1st Round
Jul 2
Eva Vedder
W50 Palma Del Rio · Final
Jun 28
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 11–62 matches
| Metric | Tommaso | Micic |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 18% | 56% |
| Sets won | 23% | 53% |
| Games won | 36% | 51% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Tommaso | Micic |
|---|---|---|
| ITF W35 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Tommaso | Micic |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.