Cherry Kim vs Patsy DaughtersPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Cherry Kim and Patsy Daughters have met 1 time since 2026; Patsy Daughters leads 1–0. Across all meetings Kim has taken 0 sets to Daughters's 2. Their most recent meeting: Patsy Daughters won at Claremont ITF (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Kim | Daughters | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Cherry Kim | Patsy Daughters | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 60% | 3/5 | 100% | 4/4 |
| Wins a set when losing | 20% | 2/10 | 25% | 1/4 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 27% | 4/15 | 13% | 1/8 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 33% | 1/3 | 0% | 0/1 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 43% | 3/7 | 33% | 1/3 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 0% | 0/1 | 100% | 1/1 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 60% | 3/5 | 80% | 4/5 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 60% | 3/5 | 80% | 4/5 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Kim 0, Daughters 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kim
⚔️ The Gladiator
Daughters
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The ⚔️ The Gladiator archetype wins about 68% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,320 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Cherry Kim.
The Gladiator players often use physical intensity and balanced game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jun 22, 2026
Claremont ITF
H Hard
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Kim | Daughters | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Cherry Kim | Patsy Daughters | ||
| 1 or more | 0% | 0/1 | 33% | 1/3 |
| 3 or more | 0% | 0/1 | 0% | 0/3 |
| 5 or more | 0% | 0/1 | 0% | 0/3 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/1 | 0% | 0/3 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/1 | 0% | 0/3 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/1 | 0% | 0/3 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kim | Daughters |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–3 | 1–4 |
| Avg odds | 3.55 | 5.10 |
| ROI % | -23.0% | -39.2% |
| Units P/L | -0.92u | -1.96u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Kim | Daughters |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | — |
| Events | 1 | — |
| Matches | 1 | — |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | USA | — |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Ekaterina Tupitsyna
W15 Tianjin · 1st Round
Aug 26
Patsy Daughters
Claremont ITF
Jun 22
Tori Kinard
Sapporo ITF
Jun 16
Hwiwon Wi
Sapporo ITF
Jun 15
Natsuki Yoshimoto
W15 Tokyo · 1st Round
Jun 9
Shiho Tsujioka
Tokyo ITF
Jun 8
Lucia Gale
Tokyo ITF
Jun 7
Hiromi Abe
W15 Fukui · Round of 16
May 28
Kayla Chung
San Diego ITF
Jun 29
Cherry Kim
Claremont ITF
Jun 22
Alina Shcherbinina
W15 Irvine · 2nd Round
Jun 18
Anna Tabunshchyk
W15 Irvine · 1st Round
Jun 17
Kaia Giribalan
Irvine ITF
Jun 16
Saumrita Jagatdeo Verma
Irvine ITF
Jun 15
Katherine Hui
W15 Lakewood · 1st Round
Jun 3
Sofia Jane Thorne
Lakewood 2 ITF
Jun 1
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 8–15 matches
| Metric | Kim | Daughters |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 33% | 50% |
| Sets won | 35% | 53% |
| Games won | 42% | 51% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Kim | Daughters |
|---|---|---|
| ITF W | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Kim | Daughters |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.