Charles Broom vs Eduardo NavaPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Charles Broom and Eduardo Nava have met 1 time since 2022; Charles Broom leads 1–0. Across all meetings Broom has taken 2 sets to Nava's 1. Their most recent meeting: Charles Broom won at Charlottesville (2022).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Broom | Nava | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Charles Broom | Eduardo Nava | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 76% | 48/63 | — | |
| Wins a set when losing | 37% | 10/27 | — | |
| Goes to a deciding set | 28% | 25/90 | — | |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 66% | 40/61 | — | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 67% | 16/24 | — | |
| Tiebreak sets won | 54% | 14/26 | — | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 92% | 55/60 | — | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 80% | 48/60 | — | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Broom 0, Nava 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Broom
👑 The Complete Package
Nava
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
Both Charles Broom and Eduardo Nava are 👑 The Complete Package types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit, across 144 matches in our dataset the historical split is about even.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Oct 30, 2022
Charlottesville
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Broom | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 16–7 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.81 | - |
| ROI % | +8.6% | - |
| Units P/L | +1.98u | - |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Broom | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | — |
| Events | 3 | — |
| Matches | 13 | — |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | GBR | — |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
George Loffhagen
Roehampton 2 Challenger · Final
Aug 29
Oliver Tarvet
Roehampton 2 Challenger · Semifinals
Aug 28
Max Basing
Roehampton 2 Challenger · Quarterfinals
Aug 27
Patrick Brady
Roehampton 2 Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 26
Leonardo Rossi
Roehampton 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 25
Oliver Tarvet
Roehampton 1 Challenger · Quarterfinals
Aug 20
Alex Rybakov
Roehampton 1 Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 19
Filip Peliwo
Roehampton 1 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 18
Charles Broom
Charlottesville · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 30
Donald Young
Cary · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 11
Christopher O'Connell
Winston-Salem · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 20
Thiago Monteiro
Winston-Salem · Round of 32
Aug 24
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Winston-Salem · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 2
Nathaniel Lammons
Irving · 1st Round Qualifying
Mar 1
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 90–90 matches
| Metric | Broom | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 70% | - |
| Sets won | 66% | - |
| Games won | 56% | - |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Broom | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Broom | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.