Cem Ilkel vs Matej DodigPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Cem Ilkel and Matej Dodig have met 1 time since 2024; Matej Dodig leads 1–0. Across all meetings Ilkel has taken 1 sets to Dodig's 2. Their most recent meeting: Matej Dodig won at Bad Waltersdorf (2024).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Ilkel | Dodig | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Cem Ilkel | Matej Dodig | ||
| Wins in straight sets | — | 58% | 18/31 | |
| Wins a set when losing | 100% | 1/1 | 42% | 10/24 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 100% | 1/1 | 42% | 23/55 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 39% | 11/28 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 100% | 1/1 | 74% | 20/27 |
| Tiebreak sets won | — | 50% | 11/22 | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | — | 83% | 25/30 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | — | 60% | 18/30 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Ilkel 0, Dodig 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ilkel
💥 Big Hitter
Dodig
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (50% vs 50%, 3,444 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Sep 18, 2024
Bad Waltersdorf
C Clay · Round of 32
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ilkel | Dodig |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 8–7 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.95 |
| ROI % | - | -7.3% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.10u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Ilkel | Dodig |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 5 |
| Distance | — | 185 mi · 297 km |
| Route | — | GER |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Vladyslav Orlov
Bosphorus Challenger Cup · 1st Round Qualifying
May 17
Petr Bar Biryukov
Chisinau · Round of 16
May 29
Mukund Sasikumar
Chisinau · Round of 32
May 28
Giles Hussey
Tbilisi · 1st Round Qualifying
May 18
Liam Broady
Nottingham · 1st Round Qualifying
Jan 5
Maks Kasnikowski
Calgary · Round of 32
Oct 15
Murphy Cassone
Fairfield · 2nd Round Qualifying
Oct 7
Calum Puttergill
Fairfield · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 6
Marvin Moeller
Hamburg Challenger · Semifinals
Aug 15
Rudolf Molleker
Hamburg Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 13
Denis Yevseyev
Hamburg Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 11
Lorenzo Giustino
Hagen Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 6
Stefano Travaglia
Hagen Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 4
Pablo Carreno Busta
Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag · 1st Round
Jul 14
Hugo Dellien
Trieste Challenger · Final
Jul 12
Henri Squire
Trieste Challenger · Semifinals
Jul 11
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 1–55 matches
| Metric | Ilkel | Dodig |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0% | 56% |
| Sets won | 33% | 54% |
| Games won | 39% | 51% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Ilkel | Dodig |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Ilkel | Dodig |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.