Cedric Stanke vs Semen PankinPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Cedric Stanke and Semen Pankin have met 1 time since 2026; Semen Pankin leads 1–0. Across all meetings Stanke has taken 0 sets to Pankin's 2. Their most recent meeting: Semen Pankin won at M25 Sharm ElSheikh (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Stanke | Pankin | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Cedric Stanke | Semen Pankin | ||
| Wins in straight sets | — | 73% | 53/73 | |
| Wins a set when losing | 0% | 0/5 | 48% | 14/29 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 0% | 0/5 | 33% | 34/102 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 55% | 39/71 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 0% | 0/5 | 71% | 12/17 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 0% | 0/1 | 56% | 14/25 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | — | 86% | 63/73 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | — | 73% | 53/73 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Stanke 0, Pankin 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Stanke
🏃 Pusher
Pankin
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 71% vs 🏃 Pusher across 45 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Semen Pankin.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Apr 15, 2026
M25 Sharm ElSheikh
H Hard · 1st Round
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Stanke | Pankin |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 9–8 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.58 |
| ROI % | - | -32.4% |
| Units P/L | - | -5.51u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Stanke | Pankin |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 3 |
| Events | — | 3 |
| Matches | — | 6 |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | — | TUR → KAZ → SRB |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 3 shared opponents, both Stanke and Pankin posted a 33% win rate.
| Opponent | Stanke | Pankin |
|---|---|---|
| Konstantinos Loukopoulos | W 61 60 | W 61 60 |
| Alibek Kachmazov | L 26 16 | L 16 26 |
| Ognjen Milic | L 26 46 | L 26 26 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Alibek Kachmazov
M25 Sharm ElSheikh · 1st Round
Apr 22
Semen Pankin
M25 Sharm ElSheikh · 1st Round
Apr 15
Sidharth Rawat
M15 Ahmedabad 1 · 1st Round
Mar 25
Saba Purtseladze
M15 Sharm ElSheikh 20 · 2nd Round
Dec 4
Konstantinos Loukopoulos
M15 Sharm ElSheikh 20 · 1st Round
Dec 3
Ognjen Milic
M15 Sharm ElSheikh 18 · 1st Round
Nov 19
Vlado Jankanj
M15 Kursumlijska Banja 12 · 1st Round
Jul 23
Dimitar Kisimov
M15 Kursumlijska Banja · Semifinals
Aug 22
Drazen Petrovic
M15 Kursumlijska Banja · 2nd Round
Aug 20
Dusan Bazdar
M15 Kursumlijska Banja · 1st Round
Aug 18
Fajing Sun
Astana Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 12
Dominik Palan
Astana Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 10
Fajing Sun
Istanbul Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 3
Manas Dhamne
Samsun Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Togan Tokac
Samsun Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 28
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 5–102 matches
| Metric | Stanke | Pankin |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0% | 72% |
| Sets won | 0% | 67% |
| Games won | 33% | 57% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Stanke | Pankin |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Stanke | Pankin |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.