Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Cedric Stanke vs Ognjen MilicPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Cedric Stanke and Ognjen Milic have met 1 time since 2025; Ognjen Milic leads 1โ€“0. Across all meetings Stanke has taken 0 sets to Milic's 2. Their most recent meeting: Ognjen Milic won at M15 Sharm ElSheikh 18 (2025).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months

IndicatorStankeMilic
Wins in straight setsโ€”71%
Wins a set when losing0%42%
Goes to a deciding set0%32%
Covers โˆ’1.5 sets as favoriteโ€”62%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog0%63%
Tiebreak sets won0%77%
Wins after taking set 1โ€”97%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1โ€”73%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample โ€” read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Stanke 0, Milic 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Stanke

๐Ÿƒ Pusher

Extreme retrievalLow error rateFrustrates opponentsDefensive baseline play
vs

Milic

๐Ÿ‘‘ The Complete Package

Elite serve & returnHigh BP conversionAll-surface dominanceClutch performer

Matchup analysis

The ๐Ÿ‘‘ The Complete Package archetype wins about 56% vs ๐Ÿƒ Pusher across 25 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Ognjen Milic.

The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Nov 19, 2025

M15 Sharm ElSheikh 18

H Hard ยท 1st Round

26
46
Milic

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days

MetricStankeMilic
W-L-13โ€“7
Avg odds-1.79
ROI %--9.3%
Units P/L--1.87u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricStankeMilic
Countriesโ€”3
Eventsโ€”3
Matchesโ€”5
Distanceโ€”โ€”
Routeโ€”BUL โ†’ SRB โ†’ SUI

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced ยท Last 12 months

Milic has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Stanke's 33%).

OpponentStankeMilic
Konstantinos Loukopoulos
W
61
60
W
63
64
Sidharth Rawat
L
06
67
W
63
61
Semen Pankin
L
46
36
W
62
62

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Stanke
LLLLWLL
L

Alibek Kachmazov

M25 Sharm ElSheikh ยท 1st Round

26
16

Apr 22

L

Semen Pankin

M25 Sharm ElSheikh ยท 1st Round

46
36

Apr 15

L

Sidharth Rawat

M15 Ahmedabad 1 ยท 1st Round

06
627

Mar 25

L

Saba Purtseladze

M15 Sharm ElSheikh 20 ยท 2nd Round

57
46

Dec 4

W

Konstantinos Loukopoulos

M15 Sharm ElSheikh 20 ยท 1st Round

61
60

Dec 3

L

Ognjen Milic

M15 Sharm ElSheikh 18 ยท 1st Round

26
46

Nov 19

L

Vlado Jankanj

M15 Kursumlijska Banja 12 ยท 1st Round

36
26

Jul 23

Milic
LLWLWWWW
L

Lucio Ratti

Sion Challenger ยท 1st Round

26
64
57

Aug 18

L

Vuk Radjenovic

M25 Kursumlijska Banja ยท 2nd Round

62
657
46

Aug 13

W

Ruslan Tiukaev

M25 Kursumlijska Banja ยท 1st Round

61
26
64

Aug 11

L

Gabriele Piraino

Plovdiv 2 Challenger ยท 2nd Round

46
36

Aug 6

W

Ivan Ivanov

Plovdiv 2 Challenger ยท 1st Round

60
60

Aug 4

W

Anton Arzhankin

Futures 2026

63
26
64

Jul 12

W

Anton Arzhankin

M15 Kursumlijska Banja ยท Final

63
26
64

Jul 12

W

Niksa Arsic

M15 Kursumlijska Banja ยท Semifinals

63
64

Jul 11

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 5โ€“85 matches

MetricStankeMilic
Matches won0%78%
Sets won0%71%
Games won33%56%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageStankeMilic
ITF M1501

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceStankeMilic
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Cedric Stanke vs Ognjen Milic FAQ

Ognjen Milic leads the head-to-head 1โ€“0 over 1 meetings.