Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Calum Puttergill vs Jake DelaneyPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Calum Puttergill and Jake Delaney have met 2 times since 2016; they are level 1โ€“1. Their first meeting came at Launceston in 2016 on hard. On hard courts they are level 1โ€“1. Across all meetings Puttergill has taken 2 sets to Delaney's 3. Their most recent meeting: Jake Delaney won at Taipei (2024).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months

IndicatorPuttergillDelaney
Wins in straight setsโ€”77%
Wins a set when losing0%34%
Goes to a deciding set0%27%
Covers โˆ’1.5 sets as favoriteโ€”64%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdogโ€”48%
Tiebreak sets wonโ€”60%
Wins after taking set 1โ€”92%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1โ€”77%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample โ€” read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Puttergill 0, Delaney 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Puttergill

๐Ÿงฑ The Wall

Elite returnerLow unforced errorsExtreme consistencyPhysical endurance
vs

Delaney

๐Ÿ’ฅ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies

Matchup analysis

The ๐Ÿ’ฅ Big Hitter archetype wins about 56% vs ๐Ÿงฑ The Wall across 482 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Jake Delaney.

Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the the wall's elite returner.

Previous meetings

2 career meetings, newest first

May 12, 2024

Taipei

H Hard ยท 1st Round Qualifying

46
26
Delaney

Feb 1, 2016

Launceston

H Hard ยท 2nd Round Qualifying

36
64
62
Puttergill

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days

MetricPuttergillDelaney
W-L-25โ€“5
Avg odds-1.60
ROI %-+25.4%
Units P/L-+7.62u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricPuttergillDelaney
Countriesโ€”2
Eventsโ€”2
Matchesโ€”2
Distanceโ€”โ€”
Routeโ€”AUS โ†’ TPE

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Puttergill
LLLLLLWW
L

Keegan Smith

M15 Hamilton ยท Round of 32

36
46

Dec 10

L

Cem Ilkel

Fairfield ยท 1st Round Qualifying

26
36

Oct 6

L

Bruno Kuzuhara

Lincoln ยท 1st Round Qualifying

46
46

Aug 4

L

Ryan Seggerman

Skopje ยท 1st Round Qualifying

57
06

May 19

L

Jake Delaney

Taipei ยท 1st Round Qualifying

46
26

May 12

L

Andre Ilagan

Burnie 2 ยท Round of 32

46
63
36

Feb 6

W

Moerani Bouzige

Burnie 2 ยท 2nd Round Qualifying

61
16
63

Feb 5

W

Kokoro Isomura

Burnie 2 ยท 1st Round Qualifying

63
62

Feb 4

Delaney
LLWWWWWW
L

Hyeon Chung

M25 Taipei ยท 1st Round

06
46

Aug 26

L

Moerani Bouzige

M15 Brisbane ยท Semifinals

26
46

Aug 1

W

Scott Jones

M15 Brisbane ยท Quarterfinals

63
762

Jul 31

W

Jeremy Zhang

M15 Brisbane ยท 2nd Round

62
60

Jul 30

W

Joshua Charlton

M15 Brisbane ยท 1st Round

64
16
64

Jul 29

W

Matthew Dellavedova

M15 Brisbane ยท Final

75
63

Jul 26

W

Duje Markovina

M15 Brisbane ยท Semifinals

57
62
63

Jul 25

W

Taiki Takizawa

M15 Brisbane ยท Quarterfinals

75
63

Jul 24

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

โ†‘ Puttergilllevelโ†“ Delaney

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 1โ€“96 matches

MetricPuttergillDelaney
Matches won0%67%
Sets won0%64%
Games won37%54%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StagePuttergillDelaney
ATP Challenger Tour11

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfacePuttergillDelaney
Hard11

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Calum Puttergill vs Jake Delaney FAQ

The head-to-head is level at 1โ€“1 over 2 meetings.