Braden Shick vs Timo LegoutPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Braden Shick and Timo Legout have met 1 time since 2026; Braden Shick leads 1–0. 1 of their meetings has been a final, with Shick leading those 1–0. Across all meetings Shick has taken 2 sets to Legout's 1. Their most recent meeting: Braden Shick won at Cary Challenger (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Shick | Legout | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Braden Shick | Timo Legout | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 74% | 51/69 | 86% | 19/22 |
| Wins a set when losing | 20% | 4/20 | 25% | 2/8 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 25% | 22/89 | 17% | 5/30 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 63% | 30/48 | 69% | 11/16 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 57% | 16/28 | 67% | 6/9 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 64% | 16/25 | 25% | 1/4 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 97% | 60/62 | 95% | 21/22 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 82% | 51/62 | 86% | 19/22 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Shick 0, Legout 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Shick
🪃 Counterpuncher
Legout
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs ⚔️ The Gladiator is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 1,935 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 5, 2026
Cary Challenger
H Hard · Final
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Shick | Legout | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Braden Shick | Timo Legout | ||
| 1 or more | 93% | 14/15 | 85% | 17/20 |
| 3 or more | 73% | 11/15 | 25% | 5/20 |
| 5 or more | 40% | 6/15 | 10% | 2/20 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/15 | 0% | 0/20 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/15 | 0% | 0/20 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/15 | 0% | 0/20 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Shick | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 10–5 | 15–4 |
| Avg odds | 2.13 | 1.90 |
| ROI % | +28.7% | +35.1% |
| Units P/L | +4.31u | +6.67u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Shick | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 1 |
| Matches | — | 4 |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | — | USA |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 3 shared opponents, both Shick and Legout posted a 67% win rate.
| Opponent | Shick | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Andy Andrade | W 62 63 | W 75 75 |
| Duncan Chan | W 64 63 | W 76 63 |
| Andrew Fenty | L 36 46 | L 16 64 16 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Andy Andrade
Vancouver Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Mark Lajal
Vancouver Challenger · Quarterfinals
Jul 30
August Holmgren
Vancouver Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 29
Rio Noguchi
Winnipeg Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 20
Bernard Tomic
Newport Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 8
Timo Legout
Cary Challenger · Final
Jul 5
Jay Friend
Cary Challenger · Quarterfinals
Jul 3
Fajing Sun
Cary Challenger · 1st Round
Jun 30
Evan Zhu
M25 Southaven · Final
Aug 9
Jack Anthrop
M25 Southaven · Quarterfinals
Aug 7
Alexander Frusina
M25 Southaven · 2nd Round
Aug 6
Spencer Papa
M25 Southaven · 1st Round
Aug 5
Alexander Frusina
M25 Louisville · Quarterfinals
Jul 17
Oliver Bonding
M25 Louisville · 2nd Round
Jul 16
Donald Nikolas Stoot
M25 Louisville · 1st Round
Jul 15
Nikolas Stoot
Futures 2026
Jul 15
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 31–90 matches
| Metric | Shick | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 78% | 71% |
| Sets won | 71% | 70% |
| Games won | 58% | 56% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Shick | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Finals | 1 | 0 |
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Shick | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.