Braden Shick vs Sho KatayamaPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
πΊπΈBraden Shick
#215 Β· 22 yrs Β· R
5w41 meeting Β· sets 2β0
π―π΅Sho Katayama
#1508 Β· 37 yrs Β· U
43wBraden Shick and Sho Katayama have met 1 time since 2025; Braden Shick leads 1β0. Across all meetings Shick has taken 2 sets to Katayama's 0. Their most recent meeting: Braden Shick won at M15 Yanagawa City 1 (2025).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Shick | Katayama | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Braden Shick | Sho Katayama | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 74% | 51/69 | 100% | 4/4 |
| Wins a set when losing | 20% | 4/20 | 0% | 0/3 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 25% | 22/89 | 0% | 0/7 |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | 63% | 30/48 | 100% | 2/2 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 57% | 16/28 | 25% | 1/4 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 64% | 16/25 | 0% | 0/1 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 97% | 60/62 | 100% | 4/4 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 82% | 51/62 | 100% | 4/4 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Shick 1, Katayama 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Shick
πͺ Counterpuncher
Katayama
π Pusher
Matchup analysis
The πͺ Counterpuncher archetype wins about 70% vs π Pusher across 61 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Braden Shick.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Nov 1, 2025
M15 Yanagawa City 1
H Hard Β· Semifinals
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Shick | Katayama |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 10β5 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.13 | - |
| ROI % | +28.7% | - |
| Units P/L | +4.31u | - |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Andy Andrade
Vancouver Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Jul 30
Mark Lajal
Vancouver Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 30
August Holmgren
Vancouver Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 29
Rio Noguchi
Winnipeg Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 20
Bernard Tomic
Newport Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 8
Timo Legout
Cary Challenger Β· Final
Jul 5
Jay Friend
Cary Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 3
Fajing Sun
Cary Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jun 30
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Matsuyama Challenger Β· 1st Round
Nov 3
Braden Shick
M15 Yanagawa City 1 Β· Semifinals
Nov 1
Taisei Ichikawa
M15 Yanagawa City 1 Β· Quarterfinals
Oct 31
Woong Chan Lee
M15 Yanagawa City 1 Β· 2nd Round
Oct 30
Woong Chan Lee
M15 Yanagawa City Β· Round of 16
Oct 30
Taiyo Yamanaka
M15 Yanagawa City 1 Β· 1st Round
Oct 29
Naoki Nakagawa
M25 Sapporo 2 Β· 1st Round
Sep 9
Terence Atmane
Matsuyama Challenger Β· 1st Round
Nov 4
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 7β90 matches
| Metric | Shick | Katayama |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 78% | 57% |
| Sets won | 71% | 57% |
| Games won | 58% | 55% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Shick | Katayama |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M15 | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Shick | Katayama |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.