Braden Shick vs Melvin KumarPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
πΊπΈBraden Shick
#215 Β· 22 yrs Β· R
5w41 meeting Β· sets 2β0
πΈπͺMelvin Kumar
#1483 Β· 20 yrs
5Braden Shick and Melvin Kumar have met 1 time since 2026; Braden Shick leads 1β0. Across all meetings Shick has taken 2 sets to Kumar's 0. Their most recent meeting: Braden Shick won at M15 Huamantla 1 (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Shick | Kumar | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Braden Shick | Melvin Kumar | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 74% | 51/69 | 100% | 4/4 |
| Wins a set when losing | 20% | 4/20 | 27% | 3/11 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 25% | 22/89 | 20% | 3/15 |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | 63% | 30/48 | 50% | 1/2 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 57% | 16/28 | 38% | 5/13 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 64% | 16/25 | 50% | 1/2 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 97% | 60/62 | 80% | 4/5 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 82% | 51/62 | 80% | 4/5 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Shick 1, Kumar 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Shick
πͺ Counterpuncher
Kumar
π Pusher
Matchup analysis
The πͺ Counterpuncher archetype wins about 70% vs π Pusher across 61 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Braden Shick.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jan 30, 2026
M15 Huamantla 1
H Hard Β· Semifinals
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days
| Outcome | Shick | Kumar | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Braden Shick | Melvin Kumar | ||
| 1 or more | 93% | 14/15 | 67% | 4/6 |
| 3 or more | 73% | 11/15 | 0% | 0/6 |
| 5 or more | 40% | 6/15 | 0% | 0/6 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/15 | 0% | 0/6 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/15 | 0% | 0/6 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/15 | 0% | 0/6 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Shick | Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 10β5 | 1β5 |
| Avg odds | 2.13 | 5.84 |
| ROI % | +28.7% | -66.8% |
| Units P/L | +4.31u | -4.01u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Shick | Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | β | 1 |
| Events | β | 1 |
| Matches | β | 1 |
| Distance | β | β |
| Route | β | FIN |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months
Shick has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Kumar's 50%).
| Opponent | Shick | Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| Rodolfo Jauregui Sainz de Rozas | W 75 62 | W 63 64 |
| Karol Filar | W 63 63 | L 46 67 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Andy Andrade
Vancouver Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Jul 30
Mark Lajal
Vancouver Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 30
August Holmgren
Vancouver Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 29
Rio Noguchi
Winnipeg Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 20
Bernard Tomic
Newport Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 8
Timo Legout
Cary Challenger Β· Final
Jul 5
Jay Friend
Cary Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 3
Fajing Sun
Cary Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jun 30
Markus Molder
M15 Turku Β· 1st Round
Aug 11
Matt Ponchet
M15 Dublin Β· 1st Round
Jul 29
Adam Jilly
M15 Store Β· 1st Round
Jul 1
Mak Mikovic
M15 Slovenska Bistrica Β· 1st Round
Jun 24
Matt Ponchet
M15 Vaasa Β· 2nd Round
Jun 11
Stevan Popovic
M15 Vaasa Β· 1st Round
Jun 10
Adan Freire Da Silva
M25 Deauville Β· 1st Round
May 19
Lucca Pinto
M15 Huamantla 2 Β· 1st Round
Feb 4
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 15β90 matches
| Metric | Shick | Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 78% | 27% |
| Sets won | 71% | 33% |
| Games won | 58% | 43% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Shick | Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M15 | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Shick | Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.