Braden Shick vs JiSung NamPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Braden Shick and JiSung Nam have met 1 time since 2026; Braden Shick leads 1–0. Across all meetings Shick has taken 2 sets to Nam's 0. Their most recent meeting: Braden Shick won at Miyazaki Challenger (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Shick | Nam | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Braden Shick | JiSung Nam | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 70% | 50/71 | 80% | 8/10 |
| Wins a set when losing | 26% | 6/23 | 27% | 3/11 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 29% | 27/94 | 24% | 5/21 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 57% | 30/53 | 80% | 4/5 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 59% | 17/29 | 43% | 6/14 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 63% | 15/24 | 50% | 3/6 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 97% | 61/63 | 77% | 10/13 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 79% | 50/63 | 62% | 8/13 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Shick 1, Nam 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Shick
💥 Big Hitter
Nam
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🪃 Counterpuncher is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 3,969 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Mar 31, 2026
Miyazaki Challenger
H Hard · 1st Round
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Shick | Nam |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 6–6 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 2.23 | 1.93 |
| ROI % | -6.3% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -0.75u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Shick | Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | — |
| Events | 3 | — |
| Matches | 5 | — |
| Distance | 2,418 mi · 3,891 km | — |
| Route | USA | — |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Mees Rottgering
Columbus Challenger · 2nd Round
Sep 30
Ozan Baris
Columbus Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 28
Patrick Maloney
San Diego 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 21
J.J. Wolf
Tiburon Challenger · 2nd Round
Sep 16
Erik Arutiunian
Tiburon Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 15
Shintaro Mochizuki
U.S. Open - New York · 2nd Round Qualifying
Aug 26
Clement Tabur
U.S. Open - New York · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 25
Andy Andrade
Vancouver Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Luca Castelnuovo
Shanghai Challenger · Quarterfinals
Sep 11
Denis Yevseyev
Shanghai Challenger · 2nd Round
Sep 10
Rei Sakamoto
Shanghai Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 8
Jan Kumstat
Unicredit Czech Open · 1st Round Qualifying
May 31
Laurent Lokoli
Internazionali Di Tennis - Citta'Di Vicenza · 1st Round Qualifying
May 24
Marat Sharipov
Renault Busan Open Tennis Championships · 1st Round Qualifying
Apr 12
Braden Shick
Miyazaki Challenger · 1st Round
Mar 31
Takuya Kumasaka
Koyushokucho Miyazaki Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Mar 30
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 21–95 matches
| Metric | Shick | Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 76% | 48% |
| Sets won | 69% | 49% |
| Games won | 57% | 52% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Shick | Nam |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Shick | Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.