Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Braden Shick vs Gage BrymerPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Braden Shick and Gage Brymer have met 1 time since 2026; Braden Shick leads 1–0. 1 of their meetings has been a final, with Shick leading those 1–0. Across all meetings Shick has taken 2 sets to Brymer's 0. Their most recent meeting: Braden Shick won at M15 Huamantla 1 (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorShickBrymer
Wins in straight sets70%80%
Wins a set when losing26%33%
Goes to a deciding set29%25%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite57%67%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog59%0%
Tiebreak sets won63%100%
Wins after taking set 197%83%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 179%67%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β€” read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Shick 1, Brymer 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Shick

πŸ’₯ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies
vs

Brymer

🎾 All-Court

Tactical versatilityNet approach abilitySurface adaptabilityWell-rounded game

Matchup analysis

πŸ’₯ Big Hitter vs 🎾 All-Court is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 656 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Jan 31, 2026

M15 Huamantla 1

H Hard Β· Final

61
62
Shick

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricShickBrymer
W-L6–6-
Avg odds2.23-
ROI %-6.3%-
Units P/L-0.75u-

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricShickBrymer
Countries1β€”
Events3β€”
Matches5β€”
Distance2,418 mi Β· 3,891 kmβ€”
RouteUSAβ€”

Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Across 1 shared opponent, both Shick and Brymer posted a 100% win rate.

OpponentShickBrymer
Benjamin Thomas George
W
67
62
75
W
64
61

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Shick
LWLLWLWW
L

Mees Rottgering

Columbus Challenger Β· 2nd Round

16
46

Sep 30

W

Ozan Baris

Columbus Challenger Β· 1st Round

764
06
63

Sep 28

L

Patrick Maloney

San Diego 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round

36
657

Sep 21

L

J.J. Wolf

Tiburon Challenger Β· 2nd Round

46
765
46

Sep 16

W

Erik Arutiunian

Tiburon Challenger Β· 1st Round

63
64

Sep 15

L

Shintaro Mochizuki

U.S. Open - New York Β· 2nd Round Qualifying

46
16

Aug 26

W

Clement Tabur

U.S. Open - New York Β· 1st Round Qualifying

64
75

Aug 25

W

Andy Andrade

Vancouver Challenger Β· 2nd Round

62
63

Jul 30

Brymer
LWLWWWWL
L

Nathan Ponwith

M15 Huamantla 2 Β· 2nd Round

64
36
26

Feb 5

W

Juan Sebastian Osorio

M15 Huamantla 2 Β· 1st Round

763
46
64

Feb 3

L

Braden Shick

M15 Huamantla 1 Β· Final

16
26

Jan 31

W

Benjamin Thomas George

M15 Huamantla 1 Β· Semifinals

64
61

Jan 30

W

Alex Kobelt

M15 Huamantla 1 Β· Quarterfinals

62
61

Jan 29

W

Niels Peter Van Noord

M15 Huamantla 1 Β· 2nd Round

62
61

Jan 28

W

Niccolo Catini

M15 Huamantla 1 Β· 1st Round

62
64

Jan 28

L

Murphy Cassone

Knoxville Β· 1st Round Qualifying

36
16

Nov 2

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 8–95 matches

MetricShickBrymer
Matches won76%63%
Sets won69%61%
Games won57%53%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageShickBrymer
Finals10
ITF M1510

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceShickBrymer
Hard10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Braden Shick vs Gage Brymer FAQ

Braden Shick leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.