Braden Shick vs Duncan ChanPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Braden Shick and Duncan Chan have met 1 time since 2026; Braden Shick leads 1–0. Across all meetings Shick has taken 2 sets to Chan's 0. Their most recent meeting: Braden Shick won at M25 Tulsa (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Shick | Chan | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Braden Shick | Duncan Chan | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 74% | 51/69 | 55% | 6/11 |
| Wins a set when losing | 20% | 4/20 | 18% | 2/11 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 25% | 22/89 | 32% | 7/22 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 63% | 30/48 | 50% | 4/8 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 57% | 16/28 | 46% | 6/13 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 64% | 16/25 | 25% | 2/8 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 97% | 60/62 | 100% | 8/8 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 82% | 51/62 | 75% | 6/8 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Shick 1, Chan 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Shick
🪃 Counterpuncher
Chan
🛡️ The Spoiler
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 53% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 407 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Braden Shick.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jun 18, 2026
M25 Tulsa
H Hard · 2nd Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Shick | Chan | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Braden Shick | Duncan Chan | ||
| 1 or more | 93% | 14/15 | 92% | 11/12 |
| 3 or more | 73% | 11/15 | 67% | 8/12 |
| 5 or more | 40% | 6/15 | 58% | 7/12 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/15 | 8% | 1/12 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/15 | 0% | 0/12 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/15 | 0% | 0/12 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Shick | Chan |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 10–5 | 4–8 |
| Avg odds | 2.13 | 2.18 |
| ROI % | +28.7% | -42.8% |
| Units P/L | +4.31u | -5.14u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Shick | Chan |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 2 |
| Distance | — | 145 mi · 233 km |
| Route | — | CAN |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Shick has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Chan's 67%).
| Opponent | Shick | Chan |
|---|---|---|
| Timo Legout | W 46 75 63 | L 67 36 |
| Theodore Dean | W 61 61 | W 62 64 |
| Theodore Dean | W 61 61 | W 62 64 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Andy Andrade
Vancouver Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Mark Lajal
Vancouver Challenger · Quarterfinals
Jul 30
August Holmgren
Vancouver Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 29
Rio Noguchi
Winnipeg Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 20
Bernard Tomic
Newport Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 8
Timo Legout
Cary Challenger · Final
Jul 5
Jay Friend
Cary Challenger · Quarterfinals
Jul 3
Fajing Sun
Cary Challenger · 1st Round
Jun 30
Taro Daniel
Quebec City Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 19
Thiago Agustin Tirante
National Bank Open - Montreal · 1st Round
Aug 4
Dane Sweeny
Vancouver Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 29
Shintaro Mochizuki
Winnipeg Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 23
James McCabe
Winnipeg Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 22
Daniel Milavsky
Granby Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 15
Timo Legout
M25 Laval · 2nd Round
Jul 9
Braden Shick
M25 Tulsa · 2nd Round
Jun 18
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 22–90 matches
| Metric | Shick | Chan |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 78% | 50% |
| Sets won | 71% | 47% |
| Games won | 58% | 50% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Shick | Chan |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Shick | Chan |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.