Braden Shick vs Darwin BlanchPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
πΊπΈBraden Shick
#205 Β· 23 yrs Β· R
1 meeting Β· sets 2β0

πΊπΈDarwin Blanch
#139 Β· 19 yrs Β· L
Braden Shick and Darwin Blanch have met 1 time since 2026; Braden Shick leads 1β0. Across all meetings Shick has taken 2 sets to Blanch's 0. Their most recent meeting: Braden Shick won at Charlottesville Challenger (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Shick | Blanch | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Braden Shick | Darwin Blanch | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 67% | 43/64 | 59% | 23/39 |
| Wins a set when losing | 28% | 7/25 | 41% | 13/32 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 31% | 28/89 | 41% | 29/71 |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | 51% | 24/47 | 44% | 18/41 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 58% | 18/31 | 44% | 12/27 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 63% | 15/24 | 55% | 17/31 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 95% | 54/57 | 86% | 32/37 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 75% | 43/57 | 62% | 23/37 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Shick 1, Blanch 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Shick
π₯ Big Hitter
Blanch
π€ Servebot
Matchup analysis
π₯ Big Hitter vs π€ Servebot is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 4,696 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Nov 4, 2026
Charlottesville Challenger
H Hard Β· 2nd Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days
| Outcome | Shick | Blanch | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Braden Shick | Darwin Blanch | ||
| 1 or more | 100% | 12/12 | 96% | 22/23 |
| 3 or more | 75% | 9/12 | 83% | 19/23 |
| 5 or more | 33% | 4/12 | 70% | 16/23 |
| 10 or more | 17% | 2/12 | 39% | 9/23 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/12 | 4% | 1/23 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/12 | 0% | 0/23 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Shick | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5β7 | 15β9 |
| Avg odds | 2.37 | 2.39 |
| ROI % | -1.0% | -0.2% |
| Units P/L | -0.11u | -0.05u |
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months
Blanch has a higher win rate against shared opponents (60% vs Shick's 10%).
| Opponent | Shick | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Stefan Kozlov | L 46 16 | W 63 26 76 |
| Andrew Fenty | L 36 46 | W 64 63 |
| Liam Draxl | L 26 36 | L 36 63 06 |
| Mitchell Krueger | L 26 76 26 | W 67 64 75 |
| Mees Rottgering | L 16 46 | W 63 64 |
| Patrick Maloney | L 36 67 | W 64 75 |
| Andy Andrade | W 62 63 | L 63 36 57 |
| J.J. Wolf | L 46 76 46 | W 46 76 61 |
| Mark Lajal | L 26 26 | L 46 75 46 |
| Bernard Tomic | L 26 36 | L 46 76 36 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Stefan Kozlov
Charlottesville Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Nov 6
Darwin Blanch
Charlottesville Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Nov 4
Colton Smith
Charlottesville Challenger Β· 1st Round
Nov 2
Max Hans Rehberg
Sioux Falls Challenger Β· 1st Round
Oct 27
Gabriel Debru
Fort Worth Challenger Β· 1st Round
Oct 20
Mees Rottgering
Columbus Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Sep 30
Ozan Baris
Columbus Challenger Β· 1st Round
Sep 28
Patrick Maloney
San Diego 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round
Sep 21
Braden Shick
Charlottesville Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Nov 4
Andrew Fenty
Charlottesville Challenger Β· 1st Round
Nov 3
Liam Draxl
Sioux Falls Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Oct 31
Mitchell Krueger
Sioux Falls Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Oct 29
Sebastian Gorzny
Sioux Falls Challenger Β· 1st Round
Oct 27
Jenson Brooksby
Fort Worth Challenger Β· Final
Oct 25
Sander Jong
Fort Worth Challenger Β· Semifinals
Oct 24
Mees Rottgering
Fort Worth Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Oct 23
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 73β90 matches
| Metric | Shick | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 72% | 55% |
| Sets won | 66% | 53% |
| Games won | 55% | 51% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Shick | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Shick | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.