Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Braden Shick vs Darwin BlanchPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Braden Shick and Darwin Blanch have met 1 time since 2026; Braden Shick leads 1–0. Across all meetings Shick has taken 2 sets to Blanch's 0. Their most recent meeting: Braden Shick won at Charlottesville Challenger (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorShickBlanch
Wins in straight sets67%59%
Wins a set when losing28%41%
Goes to a deciding set31%41%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite51%44%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog58%44%
Tiebreak sets won63%55%
Wins after taking set 195%86%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 175%62%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Shick 1, Blanch 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Shick

πŸ’₯ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies
vs

Blanch

πŸ€– Servebot

High ace rateDominant serviceWeaker returnBig first serve

Matchup analysis

πŸ’₯ Big Hitter vs πŸ€– Servebot is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 4,696 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Nov 4, 2026

Charlottesville Challenger

H Hard Β· 2nd Round

75
63
Shick

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days

OutcomeShickBlanch
1 or more100%96%
3 or more75%83%
5 or more33%70%
10 or more17%39%
15 or more0%4%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricShickBlanch
W-L5–715–9
Avg odds2.372.39
ROI %-1.0%-0.2%
Units P/L-0.11u-0.05u

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Blanch has a higher win rate against shared opponents (60% vs Shick's 10%).

OpponentShickBlanch
Stefan Kozlov
L
46
16
W
63
26
76
Andrew Fenty
L
36
46
W
64
63
Liam Draxl
L
26
36
L
36
63
06
Mitchell Krueger
L
26
76
26
W
67
64
75
Mees Rottgering
L
16
46
W
63
64
Patrick Maloney
L
36
67
W
64
75
Andy Andrade
W
62
63
L
63
36
57
J.J. Wolf
L
46
76
46
W
46
76
61
Mark Lajal
L
26
26
L
46
75
46
Bernard Tomic
L
26
36
L
46
76
36

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Shick
LWWLLLWL
L

Stefan Kozlov

Charlottesville Challenger Β· Quarterfinals

46
16

Nov 6

W

Darwin Blanch

Charlottesville Challenger Β· 2nd Round

75
63

Nov 4

W

Colton Smith

Charlottesville Challenger Β· 1st Round

Nov 2

L

Max Hans Rehberg

Sioux Falls Challenger Β· 1st Round

36
36

Oct 27

L

Gabriel Debru

Fort Worth Challenger Β· 1st Round

62
26
26

Oct 20

L

Mees Rottgering

Columbus Challenger Β· 2nd Round

16
46

Sep 30

W

Ozan Baris

Columbus Challenger Β· 1st Round

764
06
63

Sep 28

L

Patrick Maloney

San Diego 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round

36
657

Sep 21

Blanch
LWLWWLWW
L

Braden Shick

Charlottesville Challenger Β· 2nd Round

57
36

Nov 4

W

Andrew Fenty

Charlottesville Challenger Β· 1st Round

64
63

Nov 3

L

Liam Draxl

Sioux Falls Challenger Β· Quarterfinals

36
63
06

Oct 31

W

Mitchell Krueger

Sioux Falls Challenger Β· 2nd Round

657
64
75

Oct 29

W

Sebastian Gorzny

Sioux Falls Challenger Β· 1st Round

64
62

Oct 27

L

Jenson Brooksby

Fort Worth Challenger Β· Final

16
46

Oct 25

W

Sander Jong

Fort Worth Challenger Β· Semifinals

765
62

Oct 24

W

Mees Rottgering

Fort Worth Challenger Β· Quarterfinals

63
64

Oct 23

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 73–90 matches

MetricShickBlanch
Matches won72%55%
Sets won66%53%
Games won55%51%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageShickBlanch
ATP Challenger Tour10

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceShickBlanch
Hard10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Braden Shick vs Darwin Blanch FAQ

Braden Shick leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.