Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Borna Gojo vs Cedrik-Marcel StebePrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Borna Gojo and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe have met 1 time since 2026; Cedrik-Marcel Stebe leads 1–0. Across all meetings Gojo has taken 0 sets to Stebe's 2. Their most recent meeting: Cedrik-Marcel Stebe won at Bengaluru Challenger (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorGojoStebe
Wins in straight sets78%67%
Wins a set when losing41%50%
Goes to a deciding set29%40%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite56%43%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog75%63%
Tiebreak sets won67%67%
Wins after taking set 191%67%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 176%67%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Gojo 0, Stebe 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Gojo

🤖 Servebot

High ace rateDominant serviceWeaker returnBig first serve
vs

Stebe

🪃 Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance

Matchup analysis

The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 55% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 3,438 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Borna Gojo.

Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Jan 7, 2026

Bengaluru Challenger

H Hard · 2nd Round

57
697
Stebe

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricGojoStebe
W-L8–7-
Avg odds1.50-
ROI %-32.3%-
Units P/L-4.85u-

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricGojoStebe
Countries1—
Events2—
Matches5—
Distance523 mi · 841 km—
RouteFRA—

Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months

Gojo has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Stebe's 50%).

OpponentGojoStebe
Nicolas Mejia
W
64
76
W
76
63
Mitchell Krueger
W
76
64
L
16
16

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Gojo
LWWLWLWW
L

Jack Pinnington Jones

Villena Challenger · Quarterfinals

26
57

Oct 9

W

Philip Henning

Villena Challenger · 2nd Round

764
760

Oct 8

W

Maxi Carrascosa Diaz

Villena Challenger · 1st Round

62
62

Oct 5

L

Titouan Droguet

St. Tropez Challenger · 2nd Round

63
36
46

Sep 23

W

Vadym Ursu

St. Tropez Challenger · 1st Round

75
63

Sep 22

L

Titouan Droguet

Rennes Challenger · Quarterfinals

26
63
36

Sep 18

W

Matteo Martineau

Rennes Challenger · 2nd Round

64
64

Sep 17

W

Daniel Masur

Rennes Challenger · 1st Round

64
766

Sep 15

Stebe
LLLLWWWW
L

Stefan Kozlov

Cleveland Challenger · 1st Round

63
26
36

Feb 2

L

Mitchell Krueger

San Diego Challenger · 1st Round

16
16

Jan 27

L

Thanapet Chanta

Bangkok Open 2 · 1st Round Qualifying

61
6177
36

Jan 11

L

Pedro Martinez

Bengaluru Challenger · Quarterfinals

26
06

Jan 8

W

Borna Gojo

Bengaluru Challenger · 2nd Round

75
769

Jan 7

W

Max Houkes

Bengaluru Challenger · 1st Round

46
63
61

Jan 6

W

Alex Martinez

Champaign Challenger · Quarterfinals

36
63
75

Nov 14

W

Jay Friend

Champaign Challenger · 2nd Round

766
75

Nov 12

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 15–49 matches

MetricGojoStebe
Matches won65%60%
Sets won63%58%
Games won54%51%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageGojoStebe
ATP Challenger Tour01

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceGojoStebe
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Borna Gojo vs Cedrik-Marcel Stebe FAQ

Cedrik-Marcel Stebe leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.