Blaise Bicknell vs Timo LegoutPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Blaise Bicknell and Timo Legout have met 1 time since 2026; Timo Legout leads 1–0. Across all meetings Bicknell has taken 0 sets to Legout's 2. Their most recent meeting: Timo Legout won at Cary Challenger (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Bicknell | Legout | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Blaise Bicknell | Timo Legout | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 55% | 16/29 | 86% | 19/22 |
| Wins a set when losing | 65% | 15/23 | 25% | 2/8 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 54% | 28/52 | 17% | 5/30 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 35% | 9/26 | 69% | 11/16 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 83% | 20/24 | 67% | 6/9 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 64% | 14/22 | 25% | 1/4 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 70% | 23/33 | 95% | 21/22 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 48% | 16/33 | 86% | 19/22 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Bicknell 0, Legout 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Bicknell
🎯 Baseliner
Legout
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 55% vs ⚔️ The Gladiator across 399 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Blaise Bicknell.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jun 30, 2026
Cary Challenger
H Hard · 1st Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Bicknell | Legout | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Blaise Bicknell | Timo Legout | ||
| 1 or more | 100% | 8/8 | 85% | 17/20 |
| 3 or more | 63% | 5/8 | 25% | 5/20 |
| 5 or more | 50% | 4/8 | 10% | 2/20 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/8 | 0% | 0/20 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/8 | 0% | 0/20 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/8 | 0% | 0/20 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Bicknell | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–6 | 15–4 |
| Avg odds | 2.30 | 1.90 |
| ROI % | -41.6% | +35.1% |
| Units P/L | -3.33u | +6.67u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Bicknell | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 1 |
| Events | 2 | 1 |
| Matches | 2 | 4 |
| Distance | 0 mi · 0 km | — |
| Route | JAM | USA |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 3 shared opponents, both Bicknell and Legout posted a 33% win rate.
| Opponent | Bicknell | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Kenta Miyoshi | W 61 76 | L 67 46 |
| Andrew Fenty | L 36 76 46 | L 16 64 16 |
| Andy Andrade | L 16 36 | W 75 75 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
Kingston 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 26
Max Purcell
Kingston 1 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 18
Benjamin Bonzi
Vancouver Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 29
Murphy Cassone
Granby Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 16
Kenta Miyoshi
Granby Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 14
Timo Legout
Cary Challenger · 1st Round
Jun 30
Karl Poling
Tyler Challenger · 2nd Round
Jun 4
Johannus Monday
Tyler Challenger · 1st Round
Jun 3
Evan Zhu
M25 Southaven · Final
Aug 9
Jack Anthrop
M25 Southaven · Quarterfinals
Aug 7
Alexander Frusina
M25 Southaven · 2nd Round
Aug 6
Spencer Papa
M25 Southaven · 1st Round
Aug 5
Alexander Frusina
M25 Louisville · Quarterfinals
Jul 17
Oliver Bonding
M25 Louisville · 2nd Round
Jul 16
Donald Nikolas Stoot
M25 Louisville · 1st Round
Jul 15
Nikolas Stoot
Futures 2026
Jul 15
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 31–52 matches
| Metric | Bicknell | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 56% | 71% |
| Sets won | 55% | 70% |
| Games won | 51% | 56% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Bicknell | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Bicknell | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.