Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Blaise Bicknell vs Karl PolingPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Blaise Bicknell and Karl Poling have met 2 times since 2026; Karl Poling leads 2–0. Their first meeting came at Metepec Challenger in 2026 on hard. On hard courts Poling leads 2–0. Poling has won the last 2 meetings. Across all meetings Bicknell has taken 1 sets to Poling's 4. Their most recent meeting: Karl Poling won at Tyler Challenger (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorBicknellPoling
Wins in straight sets55%56%
Wins a set when losing65%35%
Goes to a deciding set54%40%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite35%42%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog83%61%
Tiebreak sets won64%43%
Wins after taking set 170%84%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 148%61%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Bicknell 0, Poling 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Bicknell

🎯 Baseliner

Precise groundstrokesCourt controlPatient constructionConsistent depth
vs

Poling

πŸ›‘οΈ The Spoiler

Strong court coverageStrong retrievalDefensive consistencyBeats elite opponents

Matchup analysis

The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 56% vs πŸ›‘οΈ The Spoiler across 94 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Blaise Bicknell.

Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage.

Previous meetings

2 career meetings, newest first

Jun 4, 2026

Tyler Challenger

H Hard Β· 2nd Round

57
57
Poling

Feb 16, 2026

Metepec Challenger

H Hard Β· 1st Round

64
57
16
Poling

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days

OutcomeBicknellPoling
1 or more100%69%
3 or more63%31%
5 or more50%0%
10 or more0%0%
15 or more0%0%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricBicknellPoling
W-L2–614–5
Avg odds2.302.35
ROI %-41.6%+71.0%
Units P/L-3.33u+13.50u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricBicknellPoling
Countries12
Events22
Matches26
Distance0 mi Β· 0 kmβ€”
RouteJAMUSA β†’ JAM

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Bicknell has a higher win rate against shared opponents (60% vs Poling's 40%).

OpponentBicknellPoling
Jesse Flores
W
63
64
W
64
64
Kenta Miyoshi
W
61
76
L
67
75
57
Andrew Fenty
L
36
76
46
L
36
36
Keenan Mayo
W
76
67
76
W
63
62
Raphael Perot
L
36
67
L
57
63
46

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Bicknell
LLLLWLLW
L

Ivan Marrero Curbelo

Kingston 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round

63
57
26

Aug 26

L

Max Purcell

Kingston 1 Challenger Β· 1st Round

46
763
36

Aug 18

L

Benjamin Bonzi

Vancouver Challenger Β· 1st Round

63
36
46

Jul 29

L

Murphy Cassone

Granby Challenger Β· 2nd Round

767
26
57

Jul 16

W

Kenta Miyoshi

Granby Challenger Β· 1st Round

61
763

Jul 14

L

Timo Legout

Cary Challenger Β· 1st Round

36
26

Jun 30

L

Karl Poling

Tyler Challenger Β· 2nd Round

57
57

Jun 4

W

Johannus Monday

Tyler Challenger Β· 1st Round

647
64
64

Jun 3

Poling
LWWWWWLW
L

Thomas Fancutt

Kingston 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round

46
36

Aug 25

W

Luis Carlos Alvarez Valdes

M25 East Lansing Β· Final

57
765
64

Aug 16

W

Nikita Filin

M25 East Lansing Β· Semifinals

64
46
764

Aug 15

W

Axel Nefve

M25 East Lansing Β· Quarterfinals

761
64

Aug 14

W

Thomas Fancutt

M25 East Lansing Β· 2nd Round

36
767
61

Aug 13

W

Jesse Flores

M25 East Lansing Β· 1st Round

64
64

Aug 12

L

Kenta Miyoshi

Granby challenger

657
75
57

Jul 13

W

Matt Kuhar

Granby challenger

46
63
63

Jul 12

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

↑ BicknellPoling ahead↓ Poling

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 52–65 matches

MetricBicknellPoling
Matches won56%52%
Sets won55%51%
Games won51%50%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageBicknellPoling
ATP Challenger Tour02

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceBicknellPoling
Hard02

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Blaise Bicknell vs Karl Poling FAQ

Karl Poling leads the head-to-head 2–0 over 2 meetings.