Blaise Bicknell vs Daniel MilavskyPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Blaise Bicknell and Daniel Milavsky have met 2 times since 2025; Daniel Milavsky leads 2–0. Their first meeting came at Columbus in 2025 on hard. On hard courts Milavsky leads 2–0. Milavsky has won the last 2 meetings. Across all meetings Bicknell has taken 1 sets to Milavsky's 4. Their most recent meeting: Daniel Milavsky won at Columbus Challenger (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Bicknell | Milavsky | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Blaise Bicknell | Daniel Milavsky | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 56% | 15/27 | 78% | 38/49 |
| Wins a set when losing | 59% | 13/22 | 52% | 15/29 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 51% | 25/49 | 33% | 26/78 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 38% | 9/24 | 59% | 30/51 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 78% | 18/23 | 65% | 15/23 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 60% | 12/20 | 52% | 12/23 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 68% | 21/31 | 83% | 45/54 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 48% | 15/31 | 70% | 38/54 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Bicknell 0, Milavsky 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Bicknell
💥 Big Hitter
Milavsky
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 53% vs 👑 The Complete Package across 1,618 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Blaise Bicknell.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the the complete package's elite serve & return.
Previous meetings
2 career meetings, newest first
Sep 28, 2026
Columbus Challenger
H Hard · 1st Round
Sep 14, 2025
Columbus
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Bicknell | Milavsky | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Blaise Bicknell | Daniel Milavsky | ||
| 1 or more | 100% | 7/7 | 100% | 14/14 |
| 3 or more | 86% | 6/7 | 86% | 12/14 |
| 5 or more | 86% | 6/7 | 86% | 12/14 |
| 10 or more | 14% | 1/7 | 7% | 1/14 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/7 | 0% | 0/14 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/7 | 0% | 0/14 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Bicknell | Milavsky |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–6 | 10–8 |
| Avg odds | 2.91 | 2.07 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | +8.2% |
| Units P/L | -6.00u | +1.48u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Bicknell | Milavsky |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 1 |
| Events | 3 | 3 |
| Matches | 3 | 4 |
| Distance | 2,418 mi · 3,891 km | 2,418 mi · 3,891 km |
| Route | USA | USA |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Bicknell has a higher win rate against shared opponents (50% vs Milavsky's 30%).
| Opponent | Bicknell | Milavsky |
|---|---|---|
| Timo Legout | L 36 26 | L 57 76 26 |
| Murphy Cassone | L 76 26 57 | L 46 16 |
| Colton Smith | L 75 67 16 | L 36 26 |
| Bor Artnak | W | L 64 36 36 |
| Mees Rottgering | L 36 16 | L 46 63 46 |
| Gianluca Brunkow | W 76 61 | L 26 46 |
| Gianluca Brunkow | W 76 61 | L 26 46 |
| Giuseppe La Vela | W 76 61 | W 62 62 |
| Jesse Flores | W 63 64 | W 63 64 |
| Raphael Perot | L 36 67 | W 75 16 61 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Daniel Milavsky
Columbus Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 28
Jakub Vrba
San Diego 2 Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 20
Trevor Svajda
Tiburon Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 15
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
Kingston 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 26
Max Purcell
Kingston 1 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 18
Benjamin Bonzi
Vancouver Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 29
Adam Walton
Bloomfield Hills Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 20
Murphy Cassone
Granby Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 16
Darwin Blanch
Columbus Challenger · 2nd Round
Sep 30
Blaise Bicknell
Columbus Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 28
Timo Legout
San Diego 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 22
Federico Agustin Gomez
Tiburon Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 15
Shintaro Mochizuki
U.S. Open - New York · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 25
Lloyd Harris
Brownsburg Challenger · Semifinals
Aug 15
Rei Sakamoto
Brownsburg Challenger · Quarterfinals
Aug 14
Edas Butvilas
Brownsburg Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 13
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 49–78 matches
| Metric | Bicknell | Milavsky |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 55% | 63% |
| Sets won | 54% | 62% |
| Games won | 51% | 55% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Bicknell | Milavsky |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 2 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Bicknell | Milavsky |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 2 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.