Azuma Visaya vs Nick BeamishPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Upcoming match
- Tournament
- M15 Bali
- Level
- ITF M15
- Round
- 3rd Round Qualifying
- Surface
- Hard
- Date & time
- September 6 · 10:35 PM ET
Azuma Visaya and Nick Beamish meet next at the M15 Bali on September 6 on hard.
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Visaya | Beamish | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Azuma Visaya | Nick Beamish | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 83% | 5/6 | 50% | 2/4 |
| Wins a set when losing | 29% | 2/7 | 38% | 3/8 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 23% | 3/13 | 42% | 5/12 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 33% | 2/6 | — | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 0% | 0/3 | 38% | 3/8 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 67% | 2/3 | 60% | 3/5 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 83% | 5/6 | 100% | 3/3 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 83% | 5/6 | 67% | 2/3 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record.
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Visaya
🎾 All-Court
Beamish
🧱 The Wall
Matchup analysis
The 🎾 All-Court archetype wins about 56% vs 🧱 The Wall across 92 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Azuma Visaya.
All-Court players often use tactical versatility and net approach ability to pressure the the wall's elite returner.
Previous meetings
First career meeting
Visaya and Beamish have never faced each other on tour.
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Visaya | Beamish | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Azuma Visaya | Nick Beamish | ||
| 1 or more | 80% | 4/5 | 25% | 1/4 |
| 3 or more | 80% | 4/5 | 0% | 0/4 |
| 5 or more | 40% | 2/5 | 0% | 0/4 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/5 | 0% | 0/4 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/5 | 0% | 0/4 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/5 | 0% | 0/4 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Visaya | Beamish |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–5 | 1–2 |
| Avg odds | 1.77 | 5.82 |
| ROI % | -34.2% | +13.3% |
| Units P/L | -3.42u | +0.40u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Visaya | Beamish |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 1 |
| Events | 1 | 1 |
| Matches | 2 | 2 |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | INA | INA |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Visaya and Beamish posted a 100% win rate.
| Opponent | Visaya | Beamish |
|---|---|---|
| M Ragil Putra Yudha | W 62 61 | W 60 60 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
M Ragil Putra Yudha
M15 Bali · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 6
Digvijaypratap Singh
M15 Bali · 1st Round
Sep 1
Ren Nakamura
M15 Bali · 3rd Round Qualifying
Aug 31
Kareem Abdul Hakim
M15 Bali · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 30
Aniketh Venkataraman
M15 Bali · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 27
Jerall Yasin
M15 Bali · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 26
Alexander Chang
M15 Bali · 1st Round
Jul 22
Tanapatt Nirundorn
M15 Bali · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 20
Ryotaro Taguchi
M15 Bali · 1st Round
Sep 2
Corban Crowther
M15 Bali · 3rd Round Qualifying
Aug 31
Mykhailo Reshetniak
M15 Bali · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 30
Mathieu Scaglia
M15 Monastir · 1st Round
Jun 16
Ivan Dorokhov
M15 Monastir · 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 7
Mathieu Scaglia
M15 Monastir · 1st Round
May 19
Loann Massard
M15 Monastir · 1st Round
May 13
Ned Smith
M15 Monastir · 3rd Round Qualifying
May 12
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 12–13 matches
| Metric | Visaya | Beamish |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 46% | 33% |
| Sets won | 48% | 38% |
| Games won | 51% | 42% |