August Holmgren vs Braden ShickPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

π©π°August Holmgren
#244 Β· 28 yrs Β· R
5w1 meeting Β· sets 1β2
πΊπΈBraden Shick
#215 Β· 22 yrs Β· R
5w4August Holmgren and Braden Shick have met 1 time since 2026; Braden Shick leads 1β0. Across all meetings Holmgren has taken 1 sets to Shick's 2. Their most recent meeting: Braden Shick won at Vancouver Challenger (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Holmgren | Shick | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | August Holmgren | Braden Shick | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 66% | 19/29 | 74% | 51/69 |
| Wins a set when losing | 47% | 14/30 | 20% | 4/20 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 41% | 24/59 | 25% | 22/89 |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | 40% | 10/25 | 63% | 30/48 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 57% | 17/30 | 57% | 16/28 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 62% | 18/29 | 64% | 16/25 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 81% | 25/31 | 97% | 60/62 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 61% | 19/31 | 82% | 51/62 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Holmgren 0, Shick 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Holmgren
π€ Servebot
Shick
πͺ Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The π€ Servebot archetype wins about 57% vs πͺ Counterpuncher across 2,280 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward August Holmgren.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 29, 2026
Vancouver Challenger
H Hard Β· 1st Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days
| Outcome | Holmgren | Shick | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | August Holmgren | Braden Shick | ||
| 1 or more | 93% | 13/14 | 93% | 14/15 |
| 3 or more | 93% | 13/14 | 73% | 11/15 |
| 5 or more | 57% | 8/14 | 40% | 6/15 |
| 10 or more | 14% | 2/14 | 0% | 0/15 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/14 | 0% | 0/15 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/14 | 0% | 0/15 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Holmgren | Shick |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8β8 | 10β5 |
| Avg odds | 1.79 | 2.13 |
| ROI % | -19.1% | +28.7% |
| Units P/L | -3.05u | +4.31u |
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months
Across 3 shared opponents, both Holmgren and Shick posted a 33% win rate.
| Opponent | Holmgren | Shick |
|---|---|---|
| Liam Draxl | L 57 61 46 | L 26 36 |
| Aidan Mayo | W 76 62 | W 62 26 62 |
| Keegan Smith | L 36 63 36 | L 06 67 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Braden Shick
Vancouver Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 29
Liam Draxl
Winnipeg Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Jul 24
Garrett Johns
Winnipeg Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 22
Aleksandar Vukic
Granby Challenger Β· Semifinals
Jul 19
Justin Boulais
Granby Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 17
Aidan Mayo
Granby Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Jul 15
Yosuke Watanuki
Granby Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 14
Tristan Schoolkate
Newport Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 8
Andy Andrade
Vancouver Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Jul 30
Mark Lajal
Vancouver Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 30
August Holmgren
Vancouver Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 29
Rio Noguchi
Winnipeg Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 20
Bernard Tomic
Newport Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 8
Timo Legout
Cary Challenger Β· Final
Jul 5
Jay Friend
Cary Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 3
Fajing Sun
Cary Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jun 30
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 59β90 matches
| Metric | Holmgren | Shick |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 49% | 78% |
| Sets won | 51% | 71% |
| Games won | 50% | 58% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Holmgren | Shick |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Holmgren | Shick |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.