Arantxa Sanchez vs Mia SlamaPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Arantxa Sanchez and Mia Slama have met 1 time since 2026; Mia Slama leads 1–0. Across all meetings Sanchez has taken 1 sets to Slama's 2. Their most recent meeting: Mia Slama won at Cary ITF (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Sanchez | Slama | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Arantxa Sanchez | Mia Slama | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 80% | 4/5 | 83% | 10/12 |
| Wins a set when losing | 21% | 3/14 | 18% | 2/11 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 21% | 4/19 | 17% | 4/23 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 0% | 0/1 | 78% | 7/9 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 30% | 3/10 | 30% | 3/10 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 100% | 3/3 | 33% | 1/3 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 80% | 4/5 | 86% | 12/14 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 80% | 4/5 | 71% | 10/14 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Sanchez 0, Slama 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Sanchez
🏃 Pusher
Slama
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 84% vs 🏃 Pusher across 488 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Mia Slama.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jun 30, 2026
Cary ITF
H Hard · Round of 32
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Sanchez | Slama |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 2–2 |
| Avg odds | 10.76 | 2.55 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -46.3% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -1.85u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Sanchez | Slama |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 1 |
| Matches | — | 3 |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | — | UKR |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Sanchez and Slama posted a 0% win rate.
| Opponent | Sanchez | Slama |
|---|---|---|
| Malaika Rapolu | L 36 26 | L 06 46 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
W15 Huamantla · 1st Round
Jul 28
Agustina Soto Neira
W15 Huamantla · 1st Round
Jul 21
Carolina Bohrer Martins
Sao Paulo 4 ITF · Round of 16
Jul 16
Nathalia Pontes Tourinho
Sao Paulo 4 ITF · Round of 32
Jul 16
Madison Brengle
Newport Beach WTA · Round of 32
Jul 8
Mia Slama
Cary ITF · Round of 32
Jun 30
Florencia Massardo Brain
W15 Asuncion · 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 21
Ayla Aksu
Figueira Da Foz · Round of 32
Jun 15
Lucciana Perez Alarcon
W50 Lexington · 1st Round
Oct 7
Jensen Diianni
W50 Lexington · 3rd Round Qualifying
Oct 6
Kate Sharabura
W50 Lexington · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 6
Gloriana Nahum
W35 Southaven · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 3
Malaika Rapolu
W75 Lexington · 1st Round
Jul 29
Kylie Collins
W75 Granby · 1st Round
Jul 15
Sachia Vickery
W75 Granby · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 13
Anastasia Malysheva
W75 Granby · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 12
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 19–23 matches
| Metric | Sanchez | Slama |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 26% | 52% |
| Sets won | 31% | 52% |
| Games won | 40% | 53% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Sanchez | Slama |
|---|---|---|
| ITF W | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Sanchez | Slama |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.