Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Anton Shepp vs Dominik PalanPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Anton Shepp and Dominik Palan have met 1 time since 2026; Anton Shepp leads 1โ€“0. Across all meetings Shepp has taken 2 sets to Palan's 0. Their most recent meeting: Anton Shepp won at M15 Singapore (2026).

Upcoming match

Tournament
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Level
ATP Challenger Tour
Round
3rd Round Qualifying
Surface
Hard
Date & time
November 8 ยท 8:10 PM ET

Book odds

Anton Shepp1.37
Dominik Palan2.86

Set spread

Shepp -1.52.00
Palan +1.51.72

Game spread

Shepp -2.51.68
Palan +2.52.05
SheppHard-court specialist (94%)PalanHard-court specialist (97%)

Record at prices like this

Anton Shepp1.37implies 75%won 86%+11 pts

At 1.37 or shorter, Anton Shepp has won 30 of 35 (86%). The price implied 75%, so Anton Shepp has beaten it by 11 points.

Dominik Palan2.86implies 26%won 29%+3 pts

At 2.86 or longer, Dominik Palan has won 9 of 31 (29%). The price implied 26%, so Dominik Palan has beaten it by 3 points.

Book prices with the bookmaker margin removed, across every priced match we hold for each player. Green beats the price by 3 points or more, red falls that far short, grey is within 3 points. Samples under ten are not shown.

Dominik Palan meets Anton Shepp in the 3rd Round Qualifying of Brisbane 3 Challenger on November 8 on hard court. Palan, ranked 606th, faces a higher-ranked opponent in Shepp at 488th. Both players arrive with winning streaks after competing heavily in recent days; Shepp has played five matches in the last two weeks while Palan has played three.

Shepp leads their head-to-head record 1-0 from a prior meeting. In recent form, the gap is significant: Shepp has won 4 of his last 5 matches and 6 of his last 10, while Palan has won 2 of 5 and 3 of 10. On hard courts more broadly, Shepp holds a 45% win rate against Palan's 35%.

Palan relies heavily on his serve and needs consistent first-serve accuracy to control points. Shepp brings a more rounded game and has shown the ability to adapt across surfaces and opponents. The question for Palan is whether he can maintain serve pressure long enough to dictate rallies; for Shepp, it is whether his all-court skill will prove too versatile to handle over a qualifying distance.

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months

IndicatorSheppPalan
Wins in straight sets77%71%
Wins a set when losing31%38%
Goes to a deciding set26%33%
Covers โˆ’1.5 sets as favorite60%58%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog40%53%
Tiebreak sets won44%48%
Wins after taking set 196%74%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 180%69%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Shepp 1, Palan 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Shepp

๐Ÿ‘‘ The Complete Package

Elite serve & returnHigh BP conversionAll-surface dominanceClutch performer
vs

Palan

๐Ÿค– Servebot

High ace rateDominant serviceWeaker returnBig first serve

Matchup analysis

๐Ÿ‘‘ The Complete Package vs ๐Ÿค– Servebot is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 1,894 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Apr 25, 2026

M15 Singapore

H Hard ยท Semifinals

64
61
Shepp

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets ยท Last 90 days

OutcomeSheppPalan
1 or more100%100%
3 or more93%93%
5 or more67%64%
10 or more20%36%
15 or more0%14%
20 or more0%7%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days

MetricSheppPalan
W-L9โ€“93โ€“9
Avg odds1.963.74
ROI %-37.7%-37.4%
Units P/L-6.79u-4.49u

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced ยท Last 12 months

Palan has a higher win rate against shared opponents (57% vs Shepp's 43%).

OpponentSheppPalan
Unknown Player
W
63
46
75
W
62
60
Yanki Erel
L
57
57
L
63
67
26
Taiyo Yamanaka
W
64
64
L
67
67
Keegan Smith
L
57
26
L
64
36
46
Tristan Stringer
L
67
62
36
W
36
76
64
Tristan Stringer
L
67
62
36
W
36
76
64
Hiromasa Koyama
W
63
61
W
75
61

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Shepp
WLWWWWLW
W

Hayden Jones

Brisbane 3 Challenger ยท 1st Round Qualifying

61
647
64

Nov 8

L

Blake Ellis

M25 Tamworth ยท Quarterfinals

647
647

Oct 30

W

Unknown Player

M25 Tamworth ยท 2nd Round

63
46
75

Oct 29

W

Unknown Player

M25 Tamworth ยท 2nd Round

63
46
75

Oct 28

W

Ethan Cook

M25 Tamworth ยท 1st Round

64
64

Oct 28

W

Unknown Player

M25 Tamworth ยท 2nd Round

63
46
75

Oct 28

L

Isaac Becroft

M25 Tamworth ยท 2nd Round

46
61
46

Oct 22

W

Reece Falck

M25 Tamworth ยท 1st Round

61
63

Oct 21

Palan
WLLLWWLL
W

Shinji Hazawa

Brisbane 3 Challenger ยท 1st Round Qualifying

64
627
765

Nov 8

L

Yosuke Watanuki

Taipei Challenger ยท 1st Round Qualifying

657
06

Nov 1

L

Egor Pleshivtsev

Ningboo Challenger ยท 1st Round Qualifying

63
16
677

Oct 25

L

Liam Broady

Guangzhou Challenger ยท 1st Round

765
46
26

Oct 20

W

Semen Pankin

Guangzhou Challenger ยท 3rd Round Qualifying

64
62

Oct 19

W

Arthur Weber

Guangzhou Challenger ยท 1st Round Qualifying

667
762
64

Oct 18

L

Sergey Fomin

M25 Qian Daohu ยท 1st Round

617
57

Oct 14

L

Keisuke Saitoh

Wuning 3 Challenger ยท 1st Round

647
46

Oct 6

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 66โ€“74 matches

MetricSheppPalan
Matches won65%52%
Sets won62%52%
Games won55%50%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageSheppPalan
ITF M1510

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceSheppPalan
Hard10

Anton Shepp vs Dominik Palan FAQ

Anton Shepp leads the head-to-head 1โ€“0 over 1 meetings.