Anton Shepp vs Dominik PalanPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
๐ณ๐ฟAnton Shepp
#488 ยท 24 yrs ยท R
1 meeting ยท sets 2โ0
๐จ๐ฟDominik Palan
#606 ยท 26 yrs ยท R
Anton Shepp and Dominik Palan have met 1 time since 2026; Anton Shepp leads 1โ0. Across all meetings Shepp has taken 2 sets to Palan's 0. Their most recent meeting: Anton Shepp won at M15 Singapore (2026).
Upcoming match
- Tournament
- Brisbane 3 Challenger
- Level
- ATP Challenger Tour
- Round
- 3rd Round Qualifying
- Surface
- Hard
- Date & time
- November 8 ยท 8:10 PM ET
Book odds
Set spread
Game spread
Record at prices like this
At 1.37 or shorter, Anton Shepp has won 30 of 35 (86%). The price implied 75%, so Anton Shepp has beaten it by 11 points.
At 2.86 or longer, Dominik Palan has won 9 of 31 (29%). The price implied 26%, so Dominik Palan has beaten it by 3 points.
Book prices with the bookmaker margin removed, across every priced match we hold for each player. Green beats the price by 3 points or more, red falls that far short, grey is within 3 points. Samples under ten are not shown.
Dominik Palan meets Anton Shepp in the 3rd Round Qualifying of Brisbane 3 Challenger on November 8 on hard court. Palan, ranked 606th, faces a higher-ranked opponent in Shepp at 488th. Both players arrive with winning streaks after competing heavily in recent days; Shepp has played five matches in the last two weeks while Palan has played three.
Shepp leads their head-to-head record 1-0 from a prior meeting. In recent form, the gap is significant: Shepp has won 4 of his last 5 matches and 6 of his last 10, while Palan has won 2 of 5 and 3 of 10. On hard courts more broadly, Shepp holds a 45% win rate against Palan's 35%.
Palan relies heavily on his serve and needs consistent first-serve accuracy to control points. Shepp brings a more rounded game and has shown the ability to adapt across surfaces and opponents. The question for Palan is whether he can maintain serve pressure long enough to dictate rallies; for Shepp, it is whether his all-court skill will prove too versatile to handle over a qualifying distance.
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months
| Indicator | Shepp | Palan | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Anton Shepp | Dominik Palan | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 77% | 37/48 | 71% | 24/34 |
| Wins a set when losing | 31% | 8/26 | 38% | 12/32 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 26% | 19/74 | 33% | 22/66 |
| Covers โ1.5 sets as favorite | 60% | 29/48 | 58% | 18/31 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 40% | 8/20 | 53% | 16/30 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 44% | 8/18 | 48% | 12/25 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 96% | 44/46 | 74% | 26/35 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 80% | 37/46 | 69% | 24/35 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Shepp 1, Palan 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Shepp
๐ The Complete Package
Palan
๐ค Servebot
Matchup analysis
๐ The Complete Package vs ๐ค Servebot is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 1,894 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Apr 25, 2026
M15 Singapore
H Hard ยท Semifinals
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets ยท Last 90 days
| Outcome | Shepp | Palan | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Anton Shepp | Dominik Palan | ||
| 1 or more | 100% | 15/15 | 100% | 14/14 |
| 3 or more | 93% | 14/15 | 93% | 13/14 |
| 5 or more | 67% | 10/15 | 64% | 9/14 |
| 10 or more | 20% | 3/15 | 36% | 5/14 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/15 | 14% | 2/14 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/15 | 7% | 1/14 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days
| Metric | Shepp | Palan |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 9โ9 | 3โ9 |
| Avg odds | 1.96 | 3.74 |
| ROI % | -37.7% | -37.4% |
| Units P/L | -6.79u | -4.49u |
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced ยท Last 12 months
Palan has a higher win rate against shared opponents (57% vs Shepp's 43%).
| Opponent | Shepp | Palan |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown Player | W 63 46 75 | W 62 60 |
| Yanki Erel | L 57 57 | L 63 67 26 |
| Taiyo Yamanaka | W 64 64 | L 67 67 |
| Keegan Smith | L 57 26 | L 64 36 46 |
| Tristan Stringer | L 67 62 36 | W 36 76 64 |
| Tristan Stringer | L 67 62 36 | W 36 76 64 |
| Hiromasa Koyama | W 63 61 | W 75 61 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Hayden Jones
Brisbane 3 Challenger ยท 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 8
Blake Ellis
M25 Tamworth ยท Quarterfinals
Oct 30
Unknown Player
M25 Tamworth ยท 2nd Round
Oct 29
Unknown Player
M25 Tamworth ยท 2nd Round
Oct 28
Ethan Cook
M25 Tamworth ยท 1st Round
Oct 28
Unknown Player
M25 Tamworth ยท 2nd Round
Oct 28
Isaac Becroft
M25 Tamworth ยท 2nd Round
Oct 22
Reece Falck
M25 Tamworth ยท 1st Round
Oct 21
Shinji Hazawa
Brisbane 3 Challenger ยท 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 8
Yosuke Watanuki
Taipei Challenger ยท 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 1
Egor Pleshivtsev
Ningboo Challenger ยท 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 25
Liam Broady
Guangzhou Challenger ยท 1st Round
Oct 20
Semen Pankin
Guangzhou Challenger ยท 3rd Round Qualifying
Oct 19
Arthur Weber
Guangzhou Challenger ยท 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 18
Sergey Fomin
M25 Qian Daohu ยท 1st Round
Oct 14
Keisuke Saitoh
Wuning 3 Challenger ยท 1st Round
Oct 6
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 66โ74 matches
| Metric | Shepp | Palan |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 65% | 52% |
| Sets won | 62% | 52% |
| Games won | 55% | 50% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Shepp | Palan |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M15 | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Shepp | Palan |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |