Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Anna Karolina Schmiedlova vs Nadia PodoroskaPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Anna Karolina Schmiedlova and Nadia Podoroska have met 3 times since 2020; Nadia Podoroska leads 2–1. Their first meeting came at French Open - Paris in 2020 on clay. On hard courts they are level 1–1. Across all meetings Schmiedlova has taken 3 sets to Podoroska's 4. Their most recent meeting: Nadia Podoroska won at Jasmin Open Tunisia - Monastir (2023).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorKarolina SchmiedlovaPodoroska
Wins in straight setsβ€”73%
Wins a set when losingβ€”71%
Goes to a deciding setβ€”38%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favoriteβ€”59%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdogβ€”67%
Tiebreak sets wonβ€”75%
Wins after taking set 1β€”90%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1β€”76%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β€” read with care. Head-to-head: 2 of 3 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Karolina Schmiedlova 1, Podoroska 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Schmiedlova

πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance
vs

Podoroska

πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance

Matchup analysis

Both Anna Karolina Schmiedlova and Nadia Podoroska are πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit, across 14,668 matches in our dataset the historical split is about even.

Previous meetings

3 career meetings, newest first

Oct 16, 2023

Jasmin Open Tunisia - Monastir

H Hard Β· 1st Round

63
46
57
Podoroska

Aug 29, 2022

U.S. Open - New York

H Hard Β· 1st Round

63
62
Schmiedlova

Oct 2, 2020

French Open - Paris

C Clay Β· 3rd Round

36
26
Podoroska

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricSchmiedlovaPodoroska
W-L-8–5
Avg odds-3.12
ROI %--19.4%
Units P/L--2.52u

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Schmiedlova
LWLLWWWL
L

Lanlana Tararudee

Mumbai Open - Mumbai Β· 2nd Round

657
46

Feb 5

W

Tina Nadine Smith

Mumbai Open - Mumbai Β· 1st Round

627
64
61

Feb 4

L

Marina Stakusic

Guadalajara Open Akron - Guadalajara Β· 1st Round

26
46

Sep 10

L

Tatjana Maria

Guadalajara 125 Open - Guadalajara Β· Semifinals

06
26

Sep 6

W

Emina Bektas

Guadalajara 125 Open - Guadalajara Β· Quarterfinals

63
62

Sep 5

W

Kimberly Birrell

Guadalajara 125 Open - Guadalajara Β· 2nd Round

62
63

Sep 4

W

Julia Garcia

Guadalajara 125 Open - Guadalajara Β· 1st Round

46
62
60

Sep 2

L

Clara Tauson

U.S. Open - New York Β· 1st Round

61
657
26

Aug 27

Podoroska
LWLLLLWW
L

Andrea Lazaro Garcia

W100 Gran Canaria-Maspalomas Β· 2nd Round

60
36
46

Jul 30

W

Sara Cakarevic

W100 Gran Canaria-Maspalomas Β· 1st Round

64
60

Jul 29

L

Julia Stusek

MSC Hamburg Ladies Open - Hamburg Β· 1st Round

64
36
46

Jul 20

L

Petra Marcinko

UniCredit Iasi Open - Iasi Β· 1st Round

26
63
46

Jul 13

L

Marta Kostyuk

Wimbledon - London Β· 1st Round

16
26

Jun 30

L

Lucciana Perez Alarcon

W35 San Gregorio Β· Quarterfinals

46
62
06

Jun 19

W

Ruo Nan Zhang

San Gregorio 4 ITF Β· Round of 16

767
62

Jun 18

W

Ruien Zhang

W35 San Gregorio Β· 2nd Round

767
62

Jun 18

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

↑ SchmiedlovaPodoroska ahead↓ Podoroska

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 29–29 matches

MetricSchmiedlovaPodoroska
Matches won-76%
Sets won-71%
Games won-57%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageSchmiedlovaPodoroska
Grand Slam11
WTA 25001

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceSchmiedlovaPodoroska
Hard11
Clay01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Anna Karolina Schmiedlova vs Nadia Podoroska FAQ

Nadia Podoroska leads the head-to-head 2–1 over 3 meetings.