Alvaro Lopez San Martin vs J.J. WolfPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
πͺπΈAlvaro Lopez San Martin
Unranked
7w1 meeting Β· sets 1β2

πΊπΈJ.J. Wolf
#248 Β· 27 yrs Β· R
TitleAlvaro Lopez San Martin and J.J. Wolf have met 1 time since 2026; J.J. Wolf leads 1β0. Across all meetings Martin has taken 1 sets to Wolf's 2. Their most recent meeting: J.J. Wolf won at Futures 2026 (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Lopez San Martin | Wolf | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Alvaro Lopez San Martin | J.J. Wolf | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 43% | 3/7 | 70% | 16/23 |
| Wins a set when losing | 67% | 4/6 | 43% | 3/7 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 62% | 8/13 | 33% | 10/30 |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | 0% | 0/3 | 55% | 12/22 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 50% | 1/2 | 80% | 4/5 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 25% | 1/4 | 60% | 6/10 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 83% | 5/6 | 95% | 18/19 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 50% | 3/6 | 84% | 16/19 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Lopez San Martin 0, Wolf 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Martin
πͺ Counterpuncher
Wolf
π The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The π The Complete Package archetype wins about 56% vs πͺ Counterpuncher across 458 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward J.J. Wolf.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jun 20, 2026
Futures 2026
H Hard
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days
| Outcome | Martin | Wolf | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Alvaro Lopez San Martin | J.J. Wolf | ||
| 1 or more | 0% | 0/0 | 100% | 16/16 |
| 3 or more | 0% | 0/0 | 100% | 16/16 |
| 5 or more | 0% | 0/0 | 75% | 12/16 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/0 | 19% | 3/16 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/0 | 0% | 0/16 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/0 | 0% | 0/16 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Martin | Wolf |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2β3 | 12β4 |
| Avg odds | 1.98 | 1.62 |
| ROI % | -43.4% | +16.4% |
| Units P/L | -2.17u | +2.63u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Martin | Wolf |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | β | 2 |
| Events | β | 2 |
| Matches | β | 2 |
| Distance | β | 2,012 mi Β· 3,238 km |
| Route | β | CAN β USA |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Oskari Paldanius
Futures 2026
Jul 16
Nicolas Arseneault
Granby challenger
Jul 14
Florian Zimmer
Futures 2026
Jul 14
Henry Bernet
Trieste challenger
Jul 6
Jason Jung
Newport challenger
Jul 5
Lorenzo Bocchi
Futures 2026
Jul 3
Ivan Biletic
Futures 2026
Jul 2
Vito Antonio Darderi
Futures 2026
Jul 1
James Duckworth
Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati Β· 1st Round
Aug 14
Mark Lajal
Vancouver Challenger Β· Final
Aug 1
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
Vancouver Challenger Β· Semifinals
Jul 31
Hayato Matsuoka
Vancouver Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 31
Tyler Zink
Vancouver Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Jul 30
Zhizhen Zhang
Vancouver Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 29
Jacob Fearnley
Bloomfield Hills Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 24
Coleman Wong
Bloomfield Hills Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Jul 23
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 13β30 matches
| Metric | Martin | Wolf |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 54% | 77% |
| Sets won | 53% | 70% |
| Games won | 53% | 57% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Martin | Wolf |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Martin | Wolf |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.