Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Alfredo Perez vs Daniil GlinkaPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Alfredo Perez and Daniil Glinka have met 1 time since 2025; Daniil Glinka leads 1–0. Across all meetings Perez has taken 0 sets to Glinka's 2. Their most recent meeting: Daniil Glinka won at Knoxville Challenger (2025).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorPerezGlinka
Wins in straight sets83%76%
Wins a set when losing33%42%
Goes to a deciding set27%31%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite60%56%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog56%77%
Tiebreak sets won33%83%
Wins after taking set 186%88%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 171%74%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Perez 0, Glinka 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Perez

🎾 All-Court

Tactical versatilityNet approach abilitySurface adaptabilityWell-rounded game
vs

Glinka

πŸ’₯ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies

Matchup analysis

🎾 All-Court vs πŸ’₯ Big Hitter is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 620 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Nov 6, 2025

Knoxville Challenger

H Hard Β· 2nd Round

36
46
Glinka

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricPerezGlinka
W-L-8–8
Avg odds-1.91
ROI %--22.4%
Units P/L--3.58u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricPerezGlinka
Countriesβ€”2
Eventsβ€”2
Matchesβ€”8
Distanceβ€”5,550 mi Β· 8,932 km
Routeβ€”POL β†’ JAM

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Across 3 shared opponents, both Perez and Glinka posted a 67% win rate.

OpponentPerezGlinka
Edward Winter
W
62
46
76
L
76
46
46
Dylan Dietrich
L
36
46
W
63
64
Cannon Kingsley
W
64
64
W
64
62

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Perez
LLWLLWLW
L

Jay Friend

Champaign Challenger Β· 1st Round

46
75
36

Nov 10

L

Daniil Glinka

Knoxville Challenger Β· 2nd Round

36
46

Nov 6

W

Andrew Fenty

Knoxville Challenger Β· 1st Round

64
63

Nov 4

L

Dylan Dietrich

Charlottesville Challenger Β· 1st Round

36
46

Oct 28

L

Johannus Monday

Sioux Falls Challenger Β· 2nd Round

57
36

Oct 22

W

Cannon Kingsley

Sioux Falls Challenger Β· 1st Round

64
64

Oct 20

L

Dhakshineswar Suresh

Lincoln Challenger Β· 2nd Round

46
657

Oct 15

W

Dmitry Popko

Lincoln Challenger Β· 1st Round

64
64

Oct 13

Glinka
LWWWLWWW
L

Pedro Martinez

Kingston 1 Challenger Β· Semifinals

57
36

Aug 22

W

Harold Mayot

Kingston 1 Challenger Β· Quarterfinals

63
64

Aug 20

W

Elias Ymer

Kingston 1 Challenger Β· 2nd Round

64
63

Aug 19

W

Florent Bax

Kingston 1 Challenger Β· 1st Round

26
63
60

Aug 18

L

Andrea Guerrieri

Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger Β· Semifinals

60
36
46

Aug 8

W

Alexander Donski

Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger Β· Quarterfinals

764
64

Aug 7

W

Amit Vales

Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger Β· 2nd Round

75
16
64

Aug 5

W

Fares Zakaria

Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger Β· 1st Round

64
36
61

Aug 3

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 15–75 matches

MetricPerezGlinka
Matches won40%65%
Sets won44%63%
Games won48%53%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StagePerezGlinka
ATP Challenger Tour01

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfacePerezGlinka
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Alfredo Perez vs Daniil Glinka FAQ

Daniil Glinka leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.