Alexis Canter vs Emile HuddPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

๐ฌ๐งAlexis Canter
#2230 ยท 28 yrs ยท R
4w2 meetings ยท sets 1โ4
๐ฌ๐งEmile Hudd
#466 ยท 26 yrs ยท R
Alexis Canter and Emile Hudd have met 2 times since 2026; Emile Hudd leads 2โ0. Their first meeting came at M25 Nottingham in 2026 on hard. On hard courts Hudd leads 2โ0. Hudd has won the last 2 meetings. Across all meetings Canter has taken 1 sets to Hudd's 4. Their most recent meeting: Emile Hudd won at M25 Roehampton (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months
| Indicator | Canter | Hudd | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Alexis Canter | Emile Hudd | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 100% | 1/1 | 66% | 40/61 |
| Wins a set when losing | 40% | 2/5 | 30% | 9/30 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 33% | 2/6 | 33% | 30/91 |
| Covers โ1.5 sets as favorite | โ | 49% | 31/63 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 50% | 3/6 | 56% | 14/25 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 0% | 0/2 | 54% | 14/26 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 50% | 1/2 | 93% | 53/57 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 50% | 1/2 | 70% | 40/57 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample โ read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Canter 0, Hudd 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Canter
โ๏ธ Grinder
Hudd
๐ The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The ๐ The Complete Package archetype wins about 53% vs โ๏ธ Grinder across 233 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Emile Hudd.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.
Previous meetings
2 career meetings, newest first
Aug 5, 2026
M25 Roehampton
H Hard ยท 1st Round
May 5, 2026
M25 Nottingham
H Hard ยท 1st Round
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days
| Metric | Canter | Hudd |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0โ2 | 17โ7 |
| Avg odds | 5.08 | 1.80 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -0.3% |
| Units P/L | -2.00u | -0.07u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Canter | Hudd |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 2 |
| Events | 1 | 5 |
| Matches | 1 | 10 |
| Distance | โ | โ |
| Route | GBR | GBR โ FIN โ GBR |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced ยท Last 12 months
Hudd has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Canter's 33%).
| Opponent | Canter | Hudd |
|---|---|---|
| Patrick Brady | L 36 26 | W 76 64 |
| Ewen Lumsden | L 36 57 | W 63 60 |
| Leonid Sheyngezikht | W 64 62 | W 62 57 60 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Emile Hudd
M25 Roehampton ยท 1st Round
Aug 5
Patrick Brady
M25 Aldershot ยท 1st Round
Jul 29
Emile Hudd
M25 Nottingham ยท 1st Round
May 5
Ewen Lumsden
M25 Nottingham ยท 1st Round
Apr 28
Leonid Sheyngezikht
M15 Ceuta 1 ยท 1st Round
Dec 8
Loann Massard
M25 Glasgow 2 ยท 1st Round
Oct 29
Viktor Frydrych
M25 Aldershot 1 ยท 1st Round
Aug 13
Tom Hands
Nottingham 3 ยท 2nd Round Qualifying
Jul 7
Oliver Tarvet
Roehampton 2 Challenger ยท Quarterfinals
Aug 27
Matteo Martineau
Roehampton 2 Challenger ยท 2nd Round
Aug 26
Fabrizio Andaloro
Roehampton 2 Challenger ยท 1st Round
Aug 25
Alastair Gray
Roehampton 1 Challenger ยท 1st Round
Aug 17
Iiro Vasa
M15 Turku ยท 1st Round
Aug 11
Anton Matusevich
M25 Roehampton ยท Quarterfinals
Aug 7
Hugo Coquelin
M25 Roehampton ยท 2nd Round
Aug 6
Alexis Canter
M25 Roehampton ยท 1st Round
Aug 5
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 6โ91 matches
| Metric | Canter | Hudd |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 17% | 67% |
| Sets won | 29% | 62% |
| Games won | 45% | 55% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Canter | Hudd |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 0 | 2 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Canter | Hudd |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 2 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.