Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Fabio FogniniPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Albert Ramos-Vinolas and Fabio Fognini have met 9 times since 2015; Fabio Fognini leads 6–3. Their first meeting came at Hamburg in 2015 on clay. On clay courts they are level 2–2. On hard courts Fognini leads 3–1. Across all meetings Ramos-Vinolas has taken 7 sets to Fognini's 14. Their most recent meeting: Fabio Fognini won at Valencia (2023).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorRamos-VinolasFognini
Wins in straight sets50%
Wins a set when losing33%0%
Goes to a deciding set40%0%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog60%
Tiebreak sets won0%
Wins after taking set 1100%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1100%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 6 of 8 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Ramos-Vinolas 2, Fognini 4).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Ramos-Vinolas

⚙️ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude
vs

Fognini

🎾 All-Court

Tactical versatilityNet approach abilitySurface adaptabilityWell-rounded game

Matchup analysis

The 🎾 All-Court archetype wins about 54% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 337 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Fabio Fognini.

All-Court players often use tactical versatility and net approach ability to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.

Previous meetings

9 career meetings, newest first

Nov 25, 2023

Valencia

C Clay · Semifinals

46
16
Fognini

Jul 18, 2023

Gstaad

C Clay · Round of 32

61
26
62
Ramos-Vinolas

Aug 16, 2022

ATP Masters 1000 Cincinnati

H Hard · Round of 64

26
36
Fognini

Jul 11, 2021

Wimbledon

G Grass · Round of 128

6477
26
46
Fognini

Feb 15, 2017

Rio de Janeiro

C Clay · Round of 16

62
63
Ramos-Vinolas

Oct 16, 2016

Moscow

H Hard · Quarterfinals

26
26
Fognini

Oct 13, 2016

Vienna

H Hard · Round of 32

62
62
Ramos-Vinolas

Oct 10, 2016

ATP Masters 1000 Shanghai

H Hard · Round of 64

57
36
Fognini

Jul 30, 2015

Hamburg

C Clay · Round of 16

26
63
36
Fognini

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Ramos-Vinolas
LWWLLLLL
L

Jan Choinski

Valencia Challenger · Quarterfinals

46
57

Oct 9

W

Zdenek Kolar

Valencia Challenger · 2nd Round

16
63
64

Oct 8

W

Pedro Martinez

Valencia Challenger · 1st Round

64
62

Oct 6

L

Maks Kasnikowski

Villena Challenger · 1st Round

26
46

Sep 30

L

Vilius Gaubas

Seville Challenger · 1st Round

57
64
57

Sep 2

L

Yannick Hanfmann

Kitzbuhel · 1st Round Qualifying

16
6779

Jul 19

L

Ignacio Buse

Gstaad · 1st Round Qualifying

46
7866
36

Jul 12

L

Dusan Lajovic

Sassuolo Challenger · 2nd Round

16
46

Jun 18

Fognini
LLLLLLWL
L

Jamie Mackenzie

Bundesliga - men

637
57

Jul 12

L

Carlos Alcaraz

Wimbledon · Round of 128

57
7765
57
62
16

Jul 1

L

Daniel Altmaier

Mallorca · Round of 32

36
63
36

Jun 22

L

Corentin Moutet

Stuttgart · Round of 32

46
7763
36

Jun 10

L

Nicolas Moreno De Alboran

Roland Garros · 1st Round Qualifying

36
26

May 19

L

Yunchaokete Bu

Turin · Round of 16

57
26

May 15

W

Oleg Prihodko

Turin · Round of 32

75
64

May 14

L

Jacob Fearnley

ATP Masters 1000 Rome · Round of 128

26
36

May 8

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

Ramos-VinolasFognini aheadFognini

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 1–5 matches

MetricRamos-VinolasFognini
Matches won40%0%
Sets won42%0%
Games won47%44%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageRamos-VinolasFognini
Grand Slam01
ATP 50021
ATP 25011
ATP Challenger Tour01
ATP Masters 100002

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceRamos-VinolasFognini
Hard13
Clay22
Grass01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Fabio Fognini FAQ

Fabio Fognini leads the head-to-head 6–3 over 9 meetings.