WTA 250 · Queen's Club
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Dart
🪃 Counterpuncher
Rakhimova
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,785 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Harriet Dart here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Grass, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Dart | Rakhimova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–1 | 6–4 |
| Avg odds | 1.92 | 2.68 |
| ROI % | +45.0% | +101.0% |
| Units P/L | +1.80u | +10.10u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
First career meeting
Dart and Rakhimova have never faced each other on tour.
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Dart | Rakhimova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 55.1% | 58.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 66.3% | 64.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 43.4% | 40.2% |
| Aces / Match | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.2 | 5.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 43.9% | 54.2% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 43.6% | 35.7% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 59.2% | 63.5% |
| BP Converted % | 52.3% | 63.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.8% | 50.8% |
| Surface (Grass) | ||
| Grass Win % | 50% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Match summary
Harriet Dart meets Kamilla Rakhimova on grass at Queen's Club on June 11. Dart, ranked 173rd, will face Rakhimova at 89th in a matchup between two players still finding their footing on the surface. The two have never played.
Dart has won three of her last five matches and carries momentum after competing twice in the past two weeks. Rakhimova has taken a different path, winning only two of her last ten and arriving after a loss. Both players carry modest grass records; Dart sits at 9-11 on the surface while Rakhimova stands at 6-7.
Dart operates as a counterpuncher who thrives on reaction and angles rather than pace. Rakhimova constructs points methodically, grinding from the baseline and building pressure through consistency. On grass, where angles compress and rallies shorten, Dart's read-and-respond style will test her ability to shorten points; Rakhimova must sustain aggression without the extended baseline exchanges where she typically excels.
Get $25 free
New accounts only. Create a Kalshi account and predict match outcomes.
Claim offerShare this match
